New Research Explores Accuracy of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
July 9th, 2011
Apparently, Abraham Maslow was right, according to a new study. University of Illinois researchers tested Maslow’s theory and discovered that people actually do feel happier when their basic needs are met. “Anyone who has ever completed a psychology class has heard of Abraham Maslow and his theory of needs,” said professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Illinois, Ed Diener, and lead author of the study. “But the nagging question has always been: Where is the proof? Students learn the theory, but scientific research backing this theory is rarely mentioned.” The researchers used data collected over five years from over 150 countries. The information gathered pertained to positive and negative emotions resulting from various basic needs, including food, shelter, money, safety, respect, social relations, and autonomy.
The study revealed that the happiest people were those who reported feeling fulfilled in most of those areas. But, contrary to Maslow, the sequence in which their “higher” and “lower” needs were met did not influence their sense of satisfaction or joy. The researchers also discovered that those who felt their life was positive did so more when their most basic needs of food, shelter, and money were met. The higher needs, autonomy, respect, and social support, were linked to a feeling of joy. “Thus life satisfaction is not just an individual affair, but depends substantially also on the quality of life of one’s fellow citizens,” Diener said.
“Our findings suggest that Maslow’s theory is largely correct. In cultures all over the world the fulfillment of his proposed needs correlates with happiness,” said Diener. “However, an important departure from Maslow’s theory is that we found that a person can report having good social relationships and self-actualization even if their basic needs and safety needs are not completely fulfilled.” He added, “Another revision of his theory is that we found that different needs produce different types of well-being.”
© Copyright 2011 by www.GoodTherapy.org Irvine Bureau - All Rights Reserved. 
12 Comments | Click here to leave a comment.






Comments
I honestly don’t get why sex would be so important on the list. Wouldn’t that be higher on the pyramid and be up there with things like relationships and the like? If anyone can enlighten me I’d be happy to hear it.
@kayleigh- You need to remember the Four F’s of evolution: Fighting, Fleeing, Feeding, and F… fornication. Those are primal instincts. Society is to blame for everything else that’s attached to sex that’s beyond reproduction.
That’s my point of view anyway. If it had remained a reproductive act and nothing more, there would be a lot less hand-wringing over sex and relationships. We sure made it more complicated than it ever had to be.
Gimme my basic needs and I have energy left to concentrate on better things and thereby be more productive and also have time for leisure.This definitely means a happier ME!
This is the first time that I have ever seen something that I learned about in the college classroom be proven to be true in real life! Lots of money to spend to finally see it but it happened! ;)
luxuries may nit give you the best of feelings but to survive and to feel containment te basic things are necessary or you will definitely feel like you’re missing out on things,thereby breeding negativity and maybe even jealousy.
I have always found this to be so interesting. There is only so much happiness and joy that you can get out of life when you are hungry or in need of shelter. It goes without saying that the better you are provided for in this manner then the more meaningful that your life will and can be. Where the items fall in the hierarchy are inconsequential. When you are fed and provided for both physically and mentally, your life is sure to be a higher quality then it would be if these needs were being ignored and not met.
the availability of basic things definitely makes life easier and less things to worry about.and less of worrying most often leads to happiness because we are that much more able to concentrate on and achieve things.
I fully agree with this theory.Your mind is free,you’re not struggling for smaller(basic) things and can invest energy to further improve your life and living standards.
The hierarchy is just a guideline really. It’s not biological-it’s psychological. Human beings don’t vary an awful lot in terms of their biology, but in psychology, some will take that triangle and turn it nothing more than an abstract art piece. They will see the priorities completely differently from Maslow or these researchers.
Observations are opinions of one man or woman and one only, based upon their own interpretation of the data before them.
The hierarchy reflects our core and where the most basic of instincts and needs lie for us. Because of that it applies quite accurately to the majority and those it won’t apply to are a very small number indeed. It details what we need to survive and what degree of importance we align with each need. Its usability is timeless, as those researchers discovered.
I think that achieving satisfaction levels of the ones higher than basic needs-and maintaining that-is impossible. We can be satisfied with a job and a roof over their heads. Our happiness however with our lives encompasses many more wants and desires. Those are very difficult to juggle simultaneously without at least one falling into disarray.
I feel the best we can do is accept we have to neglect one aspect of our needs while we nurture another.
@Kayleigh if you don’t understand why sex is so high on the list, you’re doing it wrong ;) Pleasure, affection, and being needed/wanted are basic human needs. Have you never felt like your skin was screaming for a little touch?
Leave a Reply
By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.