Torture Survivors Sue Psychologists Who Designed Program

Pen and glasses on lawsuit paperworkEarlier this year, news that psychologists participated in a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) torture program shook the mental health community. The American Psychological Association (APA), psychology’s largest governing body, officially banned members from participating in torture in the wake of the scandal.

Now, inmates who say they were victimized by a torture program designed by psychologists John Bruce Jessen and James Mitchell have sued the duo. The suit alleges that Jessen and Mitchell earned as much as $80 million from their program.

Did Psychologists Profit from Torture?

A United States Senate report published in 2014 suggests the CIA’s torture program was brutal and ineffective. Most tortured inmates were detainees who had not been convicted of any crime, according to the report. In some cases, the detainees were released when no evidence supported their involvement in terrorism or other crimes.

Although a 2012 Justice Department inquiry investigated the CIA’s torture program, and reports from organizations such as the APA have looked into psychologists’ role in torture, neither the architects nor implementers of the program have faced legal consequences.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) hopes to change that with a lawsuit on behalf of Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud and Suleiman Abdullah Salim, who say they are torture survivors. The organization also sued on behalf of Gul Rahman, a man who died at a CIA “black site” in Afghanistan.

Salim, who was released in 2008, said in a video that he still experiences flashbacks to his torture. The suit alleges that one torture victim attempted suicide, while another was kept without clothes for more than a month. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages of at least $75,000.

Constructing a Torture Program

Mitchell and Jessen’s company—Mitchell, Jessen, and Associates of Spokane, Washington—contracted with the CIA in 2001. The team’s research was based on psychological work on dogs and centered on a state of learned helplessness to coerce confessions from detainees.

An array of ethical guidelines from organizations such as the American Medical Association ban torture. Torture is also against international law. In 2009, President Barack Obama signed an executive order officially banning torture, which was referred to at the time as “enhanced interrogation.”

References:

  1. Ackerman, S. (2015, July 11). US torture report: Psychologists should no longer aid military, group says. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/11/cia-torture-doctors-psychologists-apa-prosecution
  2. Ackerman, S. (2015, October 13). CIA torture survivors sue psychologists who designed infamous program. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/13/cia-torture-survivors-sue-psychologists-aclu
  3. Barrett, T. (2015, January 16). Senate bans torture across U.S. government. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/16/politics/senate-torture-bill-cia/
  4. Kravets, D. (2015, October 15). Detainees sue psychologists who engineered, profited from CIA torture. Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/10/detainees-sue-psychologists-who-engineered-profited-from-cia-torture/
  5. Weller, C. (2014, April 1). Torture doesn’t work, government report says. Retrieved from http://www.medicaldaily.com/torture-doesnt-work-government-report-shows-psychological-suffering-doesnt-lead-truthtelling-273840

© Copyright 2015 GoodTherapy.org. All rights reserved.

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • 3 comments
  • Leave a Comment
  • Tate

    Tate

    October 16th, 2015 at 12:39 PM

    Enhanced interrogation my foot. Would we think that it was enhanced interrogation if it happened to us or a family member we love? I think not. If they were indeed tortured and someone then profited form that then yes, sue away.

  • Austell

    Austell

    October 19th, 2015 at 11:40 AM

    If this is banned by international law, then how is it that we continue to hear more and more stories being shared about it?

  • Bradley

    Bradley

    October 20th, 2015 at 11:22 AM

    Do you ever get the feeling that there are certain entities out there just looking for cases to try and lawsuits to create?

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.

* Indicates required field.

GoodTherapy uses cookies to personalize content and ads to provide better services for our users and to analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this site you consent to our cookies.