DSM Bids Goodbye to Gender Identity Disorder, Hello to Gender Dysphoria

Unisex door symbolAfter decades of intense and relentless criticism by advocacy groups, gender identity disorder will finally disappear from the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Many transgender and gender nonconforming individuals have been diagnosed with gender identity disorder, but this diagnosis can contribute to the pathologization of gender nonconformity–which is not a mental health condition. Gender dysphoria, the diagnosis replacing GID, attempts to reduce stigma and prevent pathologization by focusing on the incongruence between an individual’s actual gender and the gender assigned at birth.

Gender Identity Disorder vs. Gender Dysphoria

The American Psychological Association has incorporated a number of significant changes into the latest revision of the DSM to differentiate gender dysphoria from the previous diagnosis of GID. Some of the diagnostic criteria remain the same, but while the diagnostic criteria for GID placed more emphasis on an individual’s behavior and outward manifestations of gender, gender dysphoria primarily takes into account the sense of incongruence between the gender assigned at birth and actual gender identity, and any associated feelings of distress, whether these feelings occur as a result of body dysphoria or social dysphoria.

Under diagnostic criteria for GID, a person assigned female at birth who engaged in stereotypically masculine behavior or dressed in stereotypically masculine clothes met some of the criteria for GID. However, the person in this scenario would not be diagnosed with gender dysphoria without also experiencing a sense of incongruence between the gender assigned at birth and the gender actually identified with.

Reasons for the Changes

As people become increasingly aware of gender-related issues, there has been a strong push to avoid pathologizing those who are transgender or gender nonconforming. Many mental health professionals and transgender rights advocates have pushed to remove any form of gender nonconformity as a mental health diagnosis, but others argue there are benefits to leaving some form of diagnosis in the DSM. 

Individuals who have a gender identity that differs from the gender assigned at birth may choose to pursue hormone treatment or gender confirmation surgery to align their physical characteristics with their gender. Doctors who prescribe hormones or perform gender confirmation surgery may not do so without an associated diagnosis from a mental health professional, and many insurance companies will not cover any part of the surgery if the individual seeking surgery or hormones has not been diagnosed. Thus, removing the diagnosis from the DSM entirely may effectively bar a number of people who wish to physically transition from doing so.

Gender Dysphoria as a Diagnosis

Many transgender rights activists have pointed out the potential harm in diagnosing people with a mental health condition based on gender identity.  The inclusion of gender dysphoria as a diagnosis aims to reduce stigma and harm by removing some of the emphasis on gender nonconformity and providing a diagnostic term that instead places more focus on the ways gender incongruence can impact an individual. Transgender and gender nonconforming individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria may experience feelings of distress or discomfort with certain of their physical characteristics, feel as if they are in the wrong body, or experience distress when others misgender them or call them by the wrong name.

The DSM-5 will give gender dysphoria its own chapter, in recognition of the fact that it is not a sexual dysfunction, a paraphilic disorder, or a mental disorder of any kind.

Some critics, however, believe the new diagnosis does not go far enough to reduce stigma or the view of gender nonconformity as a mental health condition. Diagnostic criteria still use phrasing such as “desire to be of the other gender/some alternative gender” and largely emphasizes “thinking” or “feeling” like “the other gender,” which may not accurately reflect the knowledge transgender individuals have of their true gender and may also reinforce the false concept of a gender binary. However, the DSM-5 does include some language supporting the broader, now widely upheld idea of a gender spectrum.

Though the new diagnosis of gender dysphoria may not completely eliminate stigma toward transgender individuals, this change is largely considered to be a significant improvement over the diagnosis of GID and a positive step forward in health care for those who are of a different gender than the one assigned at birth and who may experience distress as a result.


  1. Beredjick, C. (n.d.). DSM-V to rename gender identity disorder gender dysphoria. Advocate. Retrieved from http://www.advocate.com/politics/transgender/2012/07/23/dsm-replaces-gender-identity-disorder-gender-dysphoria
  2. Decuypere, C., Knudson, G., & Bockting, W. (n.d.). Response of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health to the proposed DSM-5 criteria for gender incongruence [.PDF]. World Professional Association for Transgender Health.
  3. Lowder, J. B. (n.d.). Being transgender is no longer a disorder. Slate Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2012/12/dsm_revision_and_sexual_identity_gender_identity_disorder_replaced_by_gender.html
  4. Winters, K. (n.d.). The proposed gender dysphoria diagnosis in the DSM-5. GID Reform Weblog by Kelley Winters. Retrieved from http://gidreform.wordpress.com/2011/06/07/the-proposed-gender-dysphoria-diagnosis-in-the-dsm-5

© Copyright 2012 GoodTherapy.org. All rights reserved.

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • Leave a Comment
  • Peyton

    December 22nd, 2012 at 1:13 PM

    The change certainly makes sense to me. Anyone else?

  • katy

    December 23rd, 2012 at 2:45 AM

    yes!it is definitely a good step because more and more people are now coming out with things such as these,things they were too afraid or ashamed to talk about.

    it is best to not label people who genuinely have gender issues,they need to be cared for and told that they are not alone.marginalizing certain people just because of what they are was a bad practice indeed!

  • Chas

    December 23rd, 2012 at 5:17 AM

    There is never going to be anything that will make EVERYone happy- we just have to get to a place where we can all meet in the middle and decide that this is good enough. It definitely opens you eyes to something that most of us are very unfamiliar with unless we are experiencing it for ourselves. I don’t think that the changes mean to harm, but to be a little more encompassing and helpful for those who HAVE struggles with this issue and trying to help them receive some help. It is not to try to change who they are but rather to help them and the rest of us accept that this is the way that they were made. I wish that we could wabe a magic wand and spread the acceptance but I don’t think that will ever happen, so instead we have to open our minds and go through steps like this that will hopefully lead to more acceptance later on.

  • G.R

    December 23rd, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    Why do manuals and laws always remain behind the times? When it is evident that some people have such a dilemma and that it is not a disorder, it makes not sense to put it under disorders. As for the insurance claims, we should not have to have it listed there just so insurance can be claimed. We need to be protected for such claims even without it being in the manual in the first place!

  • Brett

    December 24th, 2012 at 10:24 AM

    I agree with GR.It makes me mad that insurance and that whole lying industry pretty much dictates the way we have to diagnose and treat things these days! Who died and made them God?!

  • WILL

    December 24th, 2012 at 4:36 PM

    There is a bigger problem than the wrong term being used.It is that people think these individuals have a problem.The social stigma doesn’t help.And the compulsion to conform to what is told by others about one’s gender is only causing harm.

    Not lecturing such individuals about what their gender is would be a good start.

  • Denz

    June 19th, 2014 at 9:22 PM

    Hmm…Comparing it with homosexuality is a poor comparison IMO.

    Gayness doesn’t cause distress per se. And there is the belief implied that it’s somehow “wrong” to have a mental health disorder…this is offensive in my eyes and backward..

    I think it should remain, as it fits the the standard modern mental health definition. Any action causing distress is a mental health disorder. Making comparisons to the 1980 DSM makes little sense because no psychiatrist worth his or her salt TODAY (not 30 plus years ago) would say not “fitting in” or “not conforming” is a mental illness. It’s largely about distress in emotional and psychological means.

  • Kirra

    November 14th, 2014 at 8:06 PM

    That’s actually not true.

    You said ‘a person is “cured” only if he or she accepts his or her assigned sex’ but the DSM specifically states that ‘gender nonconformity is not in itself a mental disorder’ it’s the distress associated with it.

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.


* Indicates required field.

GoodTherapy uses cookies to personalize content and ads to provide better services for our users and to analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this site you consent to our cookies.