Can a Stress Questionnaire Identify People at Risk for Depression?May 7, 2013 • By A GoodTherapy.org News Summary
The Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) is a tool used for assessing stress in the workplace. The questionnaire consists of 57 questions relating to emotional stress, physical stress, social conditions, and quality of life at home and at work. It has been successfully used for years and is a reliable tool for identifying work-related stress. In fact, many companies and organizations have found that use of the BJSQ allows them to recognize what factors contribute to stress and, therefore, provides them an opportunity to take steps to eliminate stressful aspects. The end result is less stress for employees and better employee health, attendance, and ultimate productivity. Because stress and symptoms of stress are often seen as precursors to depression, it would be beneficial if this same test could indicate which individuals may be at risk for depression as well.
To launch an investigation into whether or not the BJSQ can identify people at risk for depression, Keiko Wada of the Department of Public Health at Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine in Japan led a study involving over 1,800 employees of a software company. The participants ranged in age from 20 to 70, and their medical records and sick leave history were assessed a year and half after they took the BJSQ. Of all the participants, only 14 went on to develop depression. When Wada looked at the BJSQ scores of those 14, it was discovered they responded positively to the 29 questions related to stress response of anxiety, fatigue, depression, and irritation.
Of the 29 questions, 18 were related to emotional stress and 11 to physical stress. Even though the physical stress scores did not predict depression, when combined with the emotional stress responses, they clearly showed a higher risk for depression. Wada added, “Therefore, the stress response of the BJSQ, including physical response, is considered to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing the onset of depression.” Wada believes that the results of this study provide evidence that the BJSQ can potentially reveal risk of not only stress, but other mental health conditions as well. Employers could use this information to get a more accurate picture of the mental health environment within their organizations and, if necessary, implement programs proven to improve emotional well-being and reduce stress.
Wada, K., Sairenchi, T., Haruyama, Y., Taneichi, H., Ishikawa, Y., et al. (2013). Relationship between the onset of depression and stress response measured by the brief job stress questionnaire among Japanese employees: A Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 8(2): e56319. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056319
© Copyright 2013 GoodTherapy.org. All rights reserved.
The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.
Purple QueenMay 7th, 2013 at 9:54 PM
Asking questions to recognize if there is risk of depression is a good thing.in fact it should be encouraged and adopted at more places.but I have one concern.
will the employees answer honestly to the questions knowing fully well that employers may take a look at their answers?what if they are afraid of the employers sacking them because they believe them to be less productive or prone to depression?I think that needs to be addressed.maybe an independent agency could come in and conduct these surveys and then implement enhancement programs, all while keep the depression prone employees’ identities a secret from the employers.
kendallMay 8th, 2013 at 3:51 AM
Don’t you think that boiling down whether you are at risk for depression to a questionnaire is a little too simplistic?
jessieMay 8th, 2013 at 11:47 PM
a questionnaire is only as reliable as the answers given by the participants.nobody wants to be portrayed as a depressed or stressed out individual,definitely not me.so there could be errors in what is inferred.
AliciaOctober 20th, 2016 at 8:20 AM
I can tell you there are a lot of people who do not want to admit anything is wrong nor do they want anyone, regardless of abiity or specialty field, Medical Physician or Physiatrist to give a person the label of having an issue related to mental health and illness. I have to say I think people would rather have something more informative that includes their own answers to complete a more fundamental, situational, family and work related background completed by a questionnaire to assess the overall wellbeing versus the possibility of getting a random person who mentally isn’t quite 100% creditable in their own mental state of mind ( say they are highly depressed due to divorce and they are in a grieving state with mixed emotions yet assessment of another person would be altered by this which is a problem for me, if it was my situation. I would want someone here is medically and psychologically educated but also grounded and unbiased but a questionnaire adds a new insight that is subjectivity which can weigh out the best options vs one objectively deciding the final outcome or assessment. If that makes sense.
Leave a Comment
By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.
Search Our Blog
- The GoodTherapy.org Team: Hi Zahra, Thank you for your comment! We have the following links that you might find helpful: Help at Your Fingertips:...
- Olivia: I do agree that foster care should be the last resort but you know that this is the best choice for many children. They will be much...
- Laken: Great reminder that we can all use from time to time.
- Mika: Very different kind of love but we have definitely grown closer now that the kids are all out of the house!
- lorna: I have always been afraid that this would immediately end the relationship so I just choose to say nothing.