Object relations therapy is a form of psychodynamic psychotherapy that focuses on how our early relationships, particularly with caregivers, shape our ability to connect with others throughout life. Unlike traditional psychoanalytic approaches that emphasize sexual and aggressive drives, object relations therapy recognizes that humans are fundamentally motivated by the need for meaningful relationships and emotional connection.

This therapeutic approach helps individuals understand how their early experiences with important people—typically parents or primary caregivers—have created internal "templates" or mental representations that influence current relationships, self-perception, and emotional well-being. Through therapy, people can identify and modify these deeply ingrained patterns to improve their interpersonal functioning and overall mental health.

Table of Contents

  • Core Concepts of Object Relations Theory
  • How Object Relations Develop
  • The Therapeutic Process
  • Techniques Used in Object Relations Therapy
  • Research and Effectiveness
  • Who Can Benefit
  • Training and Certification
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • How Therapy Can Help

Core Concepts of Object Relations Theory

What Are "Objects" in Object Relations?

In object relations theory, the term "objects" doesn't refer to physical things but rather to significant people in our lives—primarily our mother, father, or primary caregivers. Object relations theory explores how early childhood relationships shape personality development. These "objects" can also include:

  • Mental representations of important people
  • Parts of a person (such as a caregiver's nurturing or rejecting aspects)
  • Internalized images of relationships

Internal Object Relations

The building blocks of the individual's inner world are object relations units of the self and another (object) linked to one another by emotional states. These units begin their development in the relationship of infant and parent/caregiver early in life. These relationships are internalized in the first few years of life and are unconsciously repeated over the course of an individual's life.

These internal representations consist of three interconnected components:

  • The object as perceived by the self (how we see others)
  • The self in relation to the object (how we see ourselves in relationships)
  • The relationship between self and object (the emotional quality of the connection)

Splitting and Integration

A central concept in object relations theory is splitting—the psychological process of separating objects into "all good" and "all bad" categories. Splitting allows good to stay separate from bad. Projection is an attempt to eject the bad in order to control through omnipotent mastery.

In healthy development:

  • Infants initially experience caregivers as either completely good (when needs are met) or completely bad (when needs are frustrated)
  • With "good enough" parenting, children gradually learn to integrate these split aspects
  • They develop the ability to see others as whole people with both positive and negative qualities

When development is disrupted:

  • These split representations may persist into adulthood
  • People may struggle to maintain stable, realistic views of themselves and others
  • Relationships become characterized by extremes of idealization and devaluation

How Object Relations Develop

The Role of Early Caregiving

The quality of early caregiver-child relationships profoundly influences personality development and later interpersonal functioning. Schema Focused Therapy expands standard CBT by emphasizing early emotional experiences, real or perceived inadequate parenting, and relies on the healing influence of the therapeutic relationship, especially with respect to core needs for safety, nurturance, and protection.

Object relations development follows several key principles:

1. Primary attachment formation occurs in the first few months of life

2. Mental representations of self and others develop through repeated interactions

3. Emotional memories become encoded in neural networks, influencing future relationships

4. Integration of good and bad aspects leads to psychological maturity

Major Theoretical Contributors

Object relations theory evolved through the work of several key theorists:

Melanie Klein pioneered the field by observing that infants are primarily motivated by the need to form relationships rather than to satisfy drives. She identified two crucial developmental positions:

  • The paranoid-schizoid position (characterized by splitting and projection)
  • The depressive position (where integration and concern for others emerge)

Ronald Fairbairn proposed that humans are fundamentally object-seeking rather than pleasure-seeking beings. He viewed psychological development as a progression from complete dependence toward healthy interdependence.

Donald Winnicott introduced the concept of the "good enough mother" and emphasized the importance of a facilitating environment that balances security with independence. He warned that inadequate caregiving could lead to the development of a "false self."

Contemporary Neuroscience Perspectives

Cellular and systems neuroscience provide insights that may help integrate object relations theory and neural mechanisms of systems consolidation and semanticization of affect-enhanced episodic memories derived from early interactive experiences with caretakers, and cognitive neuroscience provides insights that may explain the emergence of the sense of self from engramized autobiographical memories.

Modern research reveals how early relational experiences literally shape the brain:

  • Attachment experiences influence neural circuit development
  • Repeated relational patterns become encoded in memory systems
  • The medial prefrontal cortex plays a key role in consolidating these relational templates
  • These neural patterns influence emotional regulation and interpersonal behavior throughout life

The Therapeutic Process

Goals of Object Relations Therapy

The primary objectives of object relations therapy include:

1. Identifying unconscious relationship patterns that cause current difficulties

2. Understanding how early experiences shape present relationships

3. Integrating split-off aspects of self and others

4. Developing more realistic and stable representations of relationships

5. Improving capacity for authentic intimacy and connection

Moving patients to produce pleasurable/meaningful activities in the face of the tyranny of negative affect increases accessibility to "good objects" (i.e., positive schemas of other people) in a way that echoes what Blatt and Auerbach call "adaptive projective identification." This is also likely to occur within the transference-countertransference matrix.

The Therapeutic Relationship

The psychodynamically informed psychiatrist is ideally suited to bringing a thoughtful diagnostic understanding and a carefully planned treatment approach to axis II conditions, because the interpersonal developments in the treatment relationship are at the heart of psychodynamic thinking. A psychodynamic approach to diagnosis is heavily influenced by what develops in the transference and countertransference embedded in the therapeutic relationship.

The relationship between therapist and client is central to object relations therapy. Key aspects include:

  • Creating a secure therapeutic environment where exploration feels safe
  • Using the therapeutic relationship as a laboratory for understanding patterns
  • Working through transference reactions that reveal internal object relations
  • Providing new relational experiences that can modify internal templates

Stages of Treatment

Object relations therapy typically progresses through several phases:

1. Assessment and engagement: Understanding the client's relational history and current difficulties

2. Building trust: Establishing a secure therapeutic relationship

3. Exploration: Identifying recurring patterns in relationships

4. Working through: Processing painful emotions and challenging defenses

5. Integration: Developing more cohesive self and object representations

6. Termination: Consolidating gains and preparing for independent functioning

Techniques Used in Object Relations Therapy

Core Therapeutic Interventions

TFP is centered on the analysis of the transference, and its main technical instruments include the interpretation of patients' behavior in treatment as it reflects activation of specific transferences and the conflicts they imply. Classical psychoanalytic technique involved efforts to reach pathogenic unconscious conflicts via a technical approach that invited patients to free associate. Over time, the application of psychoanalytic technique led to the discovery that past unresolved unconscious intrapsychic conflicts emerged through the behavior patterns in the therapeutic relationship that reflected these conflicts.

Key techniques include:

1. Transference Analysis

  • Observing how clients relate to the therapist
  • Identifying patterns that reflect internal object relations
  • Interpreting these patterns to increase awareness

2. Countertransference Utilization

  • The Fairbairnian object relations therapist uses their own emotional reactions as therapeutic cues. If the therapist is feeling irritated at the client, or bored, that might be interpreted as a re-enactment of the Antilibidinal Ego and the Bad Object, with the therapist cast in the role of Bad Object.
  • Using therapist reactions as information about client's relational patterns
  • Maintaining therapeutic boundaries while being emotionally present

3. Interpretation of Defenses

  • Identifying protective mechanisms that maintain problematic patterns
  • Gently challenging rigid defenses
  • Supporting the development of more adaptive coping strategies

4. Exploration of Early Relationships

  • Examining formative experiences with caregivers
  • Understanding how these experiences created internal templates
  • Connecting past patterns to current difficulties

Contemporary Integrative Approaches

Modern object relations therapy often incorporates elements from other therapeutic modalities:

  • Mentalization-based treatment focuses on improving the ability to understand mental states in self and others
  • Transference-focused psychotherapy provides structured approaches for personality disorders
  • Schema therapy integrates cognitive-behavioral techniques with object relations concepts
  • Attachment-based interventions directly address relational security and trust

Research and Effectiveness

Evidence for Psychodynamic Approaches

A meta-analysis evaluated psychodynamic and cognitive behavior therapy's effectiveness in treating personality disorders. The analysis included psychodynamic and cognitive behavior therapy studies, all using standardized diagnostic methods and reliable outcome assessment tools. Results showed that psychodynamic therapy had a significant overall effect with indications of long-term change, and cognitive behavior therapy demonstrated an overall effect.

Recent meta-analyses demonstrate that psychodynamic therapies, including object relations approaches, are effective for:

  • Personality disorders (particularly borderline personality disorder)
  • Depression and anxiety
  • Complex trauma and attachment difficulties
  • Relationship problems

Neuroscience Support

Interactive self-organization of the PFC, a key hub in the brain's general network of cognition, is a plausible neural substrate for the successful "working through" of the anxieties of depressive position, culminating in an internally defined and maintained sense of self.

Brain imaging studies show that successful psychodynamic therapy:

  • Modifies activity in brain regions associated with attachment and emotion regulation
  • Strengthens prefrontal cortex functioning
  • Improves integration between emotional and cognitive processing centers
  • Creates lasting changes in neural connectivity patterns

Comparative Effectiveness

The status of psychodynamic psychotherapy as an empirically supported treatment for common mental disorders – an umbrella review based on updated criteria. World Psychiatry. 2023;22(2):286-304.

Current research indicates:

  • Psychodynamic approaches are as effective as cognitive-behavioral therapy for many conditions
  • Benefits often continue to grow after treatment ends (the "sleeper effect")
  • Particularly effective for complex, longstanding difficulties
  • Superior outcomes for personality disorders when compared to brief interventions

Who Can Benefit

Conditions Treated

Object relations therapy has shown effectiveness for:

Primary Applications:

  • Personality disorders (especially borderline, narcissistic, and dependent)
  • Chronic relationship difficulties
  • Attachment disorders
  • Complex trauma and developmental trauma
  • Identity disturbances

Additional Applications:

  • Treatment-resistant depression and anxiety
  • Eating disorders with relational components
  • Substance use disorders with attachment issues
  • Interpersonal problems in the workplace
  • Parenting difficulties rooted in one's own childhood

Ideal Candidates

Individuals with subsyndromal personality pathology (i.e., those organized at the neurotic level) have a very favorable prognosis and can benefit from relatively unstructured treatments. They typically do not have difficulty establishing and maintaining a therapeutic alliance, and transference distortions tend to be slow in developing, consistent, and subtle. For individuals with a full, syndromal personality disorder (i.e., those organized at a borderline level), the treatment goal is to ameliorate identity pathology and promote normal identity consolidation.

People who may particularly benefit include those who:

  • Experience repetitive relationship patterns
  • Struggle with emotional intimacy
  • Have difficulty maintaining stable self-esteem
  • Find themselves in cycles of idealization and disappointment
  • Want to understand the roots of their relational difficulties

Special Populations

Recent adaptations have extended object relations therapy to:

Couples and Families

  • David E. Scharff and Jill Savege Scharff extended object relations theory into relational systems, especially in the treatment of couples and families. Their approach emphasizes how partners or family members enact internal object relations in interaction and how the therapist's own self and countertransference become key instruments of change. Their concepts of centered holding and contextual holding describe relational stances that facilitate the emergence and reworking of unconscious dynamics within ongoing interactions. In Object Relations Couple Therapy and Object Relations Family Therapy, they apply classical object relations concepts such as projections, introjections, holding, and transference to the domain of intimate and familial relationships.

Adolescents and Young Adults

  • Modified approaches for identity formation issues
  • Integration with attachment-based family therapy
  • Focus on developmental transitions

Cultural Adaptations

  • Consideration of cultural variations in attachment and relationships
  • Integration of collective versus individual identity concepts
  • Respect for diverse family structures and values

Training and Certification

Professional Requirements

Mental health professionals seeking training in object relations therapy typically need:

  • Advanced degree in psychology, psychiatry, social work, or counseling
  • Clinical licensure in their discipline
  • Prior training in psychodynamic theory
  • Supervised clinical experience

Training Programs

Object Relations theory and practice using our innovative affective learning model are at the heart of the organization. The Two-Year Certificate Program in Object Relations Theory and Practice provides a concentrated immersion in the fundamentals of object relations theory and therapy. The two-year program is designed in a modular, block training format, consisting of summer institutes offered in late spring or early summer each year, and six three-day weekend conferences over the course of two years.

Major training institutions include:

  • International Psychotherapy Institute (IPI): Two-year certificate program
  • Object Relations Institute for Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis: One-year introductory and two-year advanced programs
  • Ottawa Institute for Object Relations Therapy: Comprehensive certification program

Continuing Education

Ongoing professional development typically includes:

  • Regular supervision or consultation
  • Participation in study groups
  • Attendance at conferences and workshops
  • Personal therapy or analysis
  • Engagement with current research literature

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does object relations therapy typically take?

Object relations therapy is generally a longer-term treatment, often lasting one to several years. The duration depends on:

  • Severity and complexity of issues
  • Client's capacity for insight and change
  • Frequency of sessions (typically 1-2 times per week)
  • Treatment goals

Some people benefit from briefer focused work (6-12 months), while others with personality disorders or severe trauma may need several years of treatment.

How is object relations therapy different from cognitive-behavioral therapy?

While CBT focuses on changing thoughts and behaviors in the present, object relations therapy:

  • Explores unconscious patterns rooted in early relationships
  • Uses the therapeutic relationship as a primary tool for change
  • Emphasizes emotional experience and insight
  • Works to modify deep-seated relational templates
  • Often takes a longer-term approach

Both approaches can be effective, and some modern treatments integrate elements of each.

Can object relations therapy be combined with medication?

Yes, object relations therapy often works well in combination with psychiatric medication. A growing body of evidence suggests that psychodynamic therapy is efficacious in treating personality disorders, in some cases in conjunction with medication. Medication can help stabilize mood or reduce anxiety, making it easier to engage in the therapeutic work.

What should I expect in a first session?

Initial sessions typically involve:

  • Discussion of current difficulties and therapy goals
  • Exploration of relationship history
  • Assessment of emotional and interpersonal functioning
  • Explanation of the therapeutic approach
  • Establishment of practical arrangements (frequency, fees, etc.)

The therapist will be interested in understanding not just what brings you to therapy, but how you relate to others and yourself.

How Therapy Can Help

Object relations therapy offers a unique opportunity to understand and transform deep-seated relationship patterns that may be causing distress in your life. Through this therapeutic approach, you can:

  • Develop healthier relationships by understanding and changing repetitive patterns
  • Improve self-esteem through integration of split-off aspects of self
  • Reduce emotional reactivity by processing unresolved feelings from the past
  • Enhance capacity for intimacy by addressing fears and defenses
  • Build a more coherent sense of identity through self-exploration

If you find yourself struggling with relationship patterns, identity issues, or the lasting effects of early experiences, object relations therapy may offer the depth of understanding and transformation you're seeking.

Find a Therapist

The journey toward healthier relationships and improved mental health begins with finding the right therapeutic support. GoodTherapy.org can help you connect with qualified mental health professionals trained in object relations therapy and other psychodynamic approaches.

Take the first step: Use our therapist directory to find experienced practitioners in your area who specialize in object relations therapy, psychodynamic therapy, or attachment-based treatments.

References:

  1. American Psychological Association. (2024). Evidence-based practice in psychology: Psychodynamic approaches. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines
  2. Bockting, C. L., Brouwer, M. E., van der Spek, N., & Bosmans, G. (2024). The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of attachment-based interventions for emerging adults with suicidality: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 25, 686. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08520-z
  3. Clarkin, J. F., Cain, N. M., & Yeomans, F. E. (2023). Object relations theory model of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 77(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20220027
  4. Høglend, P., & Hagtvet, K. (2023). Exploration of the patient-therapist relationship in psychotherapy: Contemporary object relations perspectives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(10), 1056-1066. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2023.23040422
  5. International Psychotherapy Institute. (2024). Object relations theory and practice certificate program. Retrieved from https://theipi.org/clinical-training/object-relations-theory-and-practice/
  6. Interdepartmental Serious Mental Illness Coordinating Committee (ISMICC). (2024). Report to Congress on serious mental illness and serious emotional disturbance. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/ismicc-rtc-2024.pdf
  7. Leichsenring, F., Abbass, A., Heim, N., Keefe, J. R., Kisely, S., Luyten, P., Rabung, S., & Steinert, C. (2023). The status of psychodynamic psychotherapy as an empirically supported treatment for common mental disorders – an umbrella review based on updated criteria. World Psychiatry, 22(2), 286-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21104
  8. Mechler, J., Lindqvist, K., Magnusson, K., Ringström, A., Krafman, J. D., Alvinzi, P., Kassius, L., Sowa, J., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2024). Guided and unguided internet-delivered psychodynamic therapy for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial. npj Mental Health Research, 3(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-024-00062-1
  9. National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). Development of psychosocial therapeutic and preventive interventions for mental disorders (R61/R33 Clinical Trial Required). PAR-25-182. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-25-182.html
  10. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (2024). Psychodynamic therapy - StatPearls. NCBI Bookshelf. NIH. Last Update: September 2, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606117/
  11. Norlén, A., Broberg, A., & Hultmann, O. (2024). Child-parent psychotherapy for attachment disturbances: Feasibility and effectiveness in Swedish clinical settings. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 23(2), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2024.2337891
  12. Scharff, D. E., & Scharff, J. S. (2025). Object relations couple therapy and object relations family therapy: Clinical applications. In Wikipedia: Object relations theory. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_relations_theory
  13. Schulte-Frankenfeld, P. M., Breedvelt, J. J. F., Brouwer, M. E., van der Spek, N., Bosmans, G., & Bockting, C. L. (2024). Effectiveness of attachment-based family therapy for suicidal adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 6(4), e13717. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.13717
  14. Shahar, G. (2021). Reformulated object relations theory: A bridge between clinical psychoanalysis, psychotherapy integration, and the understanding and treatment of suicidal depression. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 721746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.721746
  15. Smith, M. M., & Hewitt, P. L. (2024). The equivalence of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depressive disorders in adults: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 80(5), 945-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23651
  16. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2024). National Directory of Mental Health Treatment Facilities - 2024. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2024-national-directory-mental-health-treatment-facilities
  17. Svrakic, D. M., & Zorumski, C. F. (2021). Neuroscience of object relations in health and disorder: A proposal for an integrative model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 583743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583743
  18. Svrakic, D. M., Zorumski, C. F., & Svrakic, N. M. (2021). Neuroscience of object relations: Theoretical and clinical implications. In P. C. Williams (Ed.), Frontiers in Psychology: Psychology for Clinical Settings. Retrieved from https://public-pages-files-2025.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583743/xml/nlm
  19. Yilmaz, M., Türkarslan, K. K., Zanini, L., Hasdemir, D., Spitoni, G. F., & Lingiardi, V. (2024). Transference interpretation and psychotherapy outcome: A systematic review of a no-consensus relationship. Research in Psychotherapy, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2024.718