Developmental Needs Meeting Strategy (DNMS) is an innovative, evidence-informed psychotherapy approach designed specifically to address complex trauma and attachment wounds resulting from unmet childhood developmental needs. This comprehensive, strengths-based therapy helps individuals heal from the deep psychological impacts of childhood neglect, abuse, and disrupted attachment relationships by systematically addressing and meeting those unmet needs in the present.

As research continues to demonstrate the profound impact of childhood trauma on adult mental health, DNMS offers a unique therapeutic framework that goes beyond traditional trauma processing. By integrating principles from neuroscience, attachment theory, and ego state therapy with bilateral stimulation techniques, DNMS provides a gentle yet powerful pathway to healing for those whose early experiences left lasting emotional and relational wounds.

Table of Contents

  • What Is Developmental Needs Meeting Strategy?
  • History and Theoretical Foundation
  • How Does DNMS Work?
  • Core Components and Techniques
  • Conditions Treated with DNMS
  • The DNMS Process: What to Expect
  • Research and Effectiveness
  • DNMS vs. Other Trauma Therapies
  • Training and Finding a DNMS Therapist
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • How Therapy Can Help
  • References

What Is Developmental Needs Meeting Strategy?

Developed by licensed professional counselor Shirley Jean Schmidt, DNMS is an ego state therapy that evolved from Francine Shapiro's Adaptive Information Processing model, which also provided the theoretical foundation for EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing) therapy. DNMS was also influenced by developmental psychology, attachment theory, inner-child work, and neuroscience.

The fundamental premise of DNMS is that many adult psychological difficulties stem not just from traumatic experiences, but equally from the absence of positive, nurturing experiences during critical developmental periods. Thus, she developed DNMS in an effort to emphasize equally the negative experiences an individual had and the positive experiences an individual did not have. This dual focus distinguishes DNMS from many other trauma therapies that primarily address what happened rather than what didn't happen.

The Attachment Wound Perspective

DNMS specifically targets what are known as attachment wounds—the psychological injuries that occur when caregivers fail to meet a child's fundamental developmental needs. Attachment wounds are a certain type of trauma that occur when parents (or caregivers) fail to adequately meet your needs. Examples include parents being neglectful, rejecting, invalidating, unsupportive, or emotionally unavailable. Or, when certain important things were absent in your childhood, such as love, understanding, nurturing, protection, and connection.

These wounds differ from single-incident traumas in that they represent patterns of unmet needs rather than specific traumatic events. The resulting deficits can lead to persistent difficulties in self-worth, emotional regulation, and interpersonal relationships that continue into adulthood.

History and Theoretical Foundation

Development of DNMS

Schmidt eventually founded the Developmental Needs Meeting Strategy Institute and has trained hundreds of mental health professionals in DNMS since 2002. The approach emerged from Schmidt's observation that many clients who had undergone traditional trauma therapy still struggled with deep-seated feelings of unworthiness, emptiness, and relational difficulties.

This approach provides an alternative to the standard trauma-treatment model, which consists of three stages and assumes that desensitization to past trauma will lead to desired changes in a person's emotions and behaviors. This model is in fact beneficial to many people in treatment, but not all people are helped by it. Schmidt suggested that those who could not identify a specific trauma, as well as those who had already desensitized to their traumas but experienced only a small amount of growth, might experience insecurity and unhappiness due to attachment needs that were not met rather than a specific instance of trauma.

Theoretical Underpinnings

DNMS theory integrates several key psychological concepts:

1. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: Abraham Maslow's theory that unmet childhood needs can lead to fixation at certain developmental stages provides a foundational understanding for DNMS. When basic needs for safety, love, and belonging aren't met in childhood, individuals may remain psychologically stuck at those developmental levels.

2. Erikson's Developmental Stages: Erik Erikson's concept that unmet developmental needs can evolve into counterproductive thoughts, emotions, and behaviors throughout the lifespan informs the DNMS approach to identifying and addressing specific developmental deficits.

3. Attachment Theory: A secure attachment between primary caregiver and infant provides a foundation for optimal development of all aspects of a child's life and throughout the lifespan. In secure attachment relationships, the primary caregiver provides a sense of safety, emotion regulation, and a secure base that develops into a healthy reciprocal relationship.

4. Neural Integration and Neuroscience: The concept that wounded parts of self become neurologically separated from resource parts of self, impacting typical neural pathway formation. When developing children get their emotional needs met by parents, their brains develop special neural pathways linking emotional centers to thinking centers of the brain. These neural pathways allow a child to grow into an adult who can self-soothe and feel secure, even when bad things happen. If these neural pathways did not adequately form in the brain when a person was little, the DNMS can help. It appears to be able to create these neural pathways now, so a person can become the healthy secure person they would have been if needs had been adequately met in childhood.

How Does DNMS Work?

The Ego State Model

DNMS operates on the principle that the personality consists of various ego states or parts of self that form in response to life experiences. The DNMS assumes ingrained states of mind can become sub-personalities, parts of self, or ego states with a point of view. Some parts form by reacting to others, while others form by introjecting others.

The approach identifies two main categories of parts:

Healthy/Resource Parts of Self:

  • Form in response to positive, affirming relationships
  • Live in the present
  • Can feel and manage the full range of emotions
  • Hold positive beliefs about self and world
  • Have an adaptive point of view

Wounded Parts of Self:

  • Form in response to traumas and unmet needs
  • Remain stuck in the past
  • Hold negative, irrational beliefs
  • Engage in unwanted or inappropriate behaviors
  • Carry the pain of unmet developmental needs

The Three Resource States

Central to DNMS is the mobilization of three internal Resource ego states that serve as the healing agents:

1. Nurturing Adult Self: Provides the compassion, care, and nurturing that may have been missing in childhood

2. Protective Adult Self: Offers safety, boundaries, and protection from harm

3. Spiritual Core Self: Represents the person's essential wisdom, strength, and connection to something greater

Designed to reframe ingrained, maladaptive messages from negative childhood experiences, DNMS works to achieve this by helping people in therapy tap into what are known as Resource parts of self—Core Self, Nurturing Adult Self, and Protective Adult Self—in order to calm unwanted responses. These Resources are utilized in the process of addressing unmet needs and healing trauma and pain. According to DNMS therapists, all people have the capacity to use inner Resources, and each Resource can play a part in attending to developmental needs that were not met in childhood.

Core Components and Techniques

1. Resource Development

The first phase of DNMS focuses on helping clients identify and strengthen their inner Resources. This process involves:

  • Guided visualization to connect with each Resource state
  • Building a felt sense of safety and nurturing from within
  • Establishing communication between the adult self and Resource parts
  • Strengthening the capacity for self-compassion and self-protection

2. Switching the Dominance

This technique helps to defuse maladaptive introjects—the internalized critical or neglectful voices from childhood. By "switching the dominance," clients learn to:

  • Recognize when wounded parts are activated
  • Consciously shift to Resource states
  • Reduce the power of negative internal messages
  • Strengthen adaptive responses to daily challenges

3. Conference Room

The Conference Room technique creates an internal meeting space where different parts can safely interact. This process:

  • Identifies specific themes of wounding (abandonment, enmeshment, neglect)
  • Allows wounded parts to express their needs
  • Facilitates communication between parts
  • Creates internal cooperation and understanding

4. Needs Meeting

The heart of DNMS, this process involves the Resource team actively meeting the developmental needs of wounded parts:

Once identified, these introjects are then invited to connect with the Resources. A DNMS therapist will guide the Resources to meet their developmental needs, process through their painful emotions, and strengthen an emotional bond. According to the DNMS model, these interactions with Resource parts of self will help introjects heal. As they heal, patients report unwanted behaviors, beliefs, and emotions diminish.

5. Alternating Bilateral Stimulation (ABS)

Similar to EMDR, DNMS incorporates bilateral stimulation to enhance processing and integration. The most traditional and researched BLS method involves clients following the therapist's finger movements. Despite the predominance of eye movements (EMs) in early EMDR studies, clinical experience suggests that all forms of BLS are effective in processing, though therapist preferences differ.

In DNMS, bilateral stimulation:

  • Strengthens neural pathways between isolated parts and Resource parts
  • Facilitates the integration of positive experiences
  • Enhances the felt sense of safety and connection
  • Supports the processing of emotional material

Conditions Treated with DNMS

Primary Applications

DNMS has shown effectiveness in treating a wide range of conditions related to childhood trauma and attachment wounds:

Complex Trauma and PTSD: Research on treatment for C-PTSD continues to show promise but is beyond the scope of this document. Recent research indicates that treatments addressing both trauma and attachment wounds show promise for complex presentations. Psychological interventions for ICD-11 complex PTSD symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2019;49(11):1761-75.

Attachment Disorders: The approach specifically targets the relational wounds that underlie many attachment difficulties. Attachment-based treatment helps to end the intergenerational trauma transmission cycle through the treatment of underlying cognitive-affective distortions and thoughts that hinder secure parenting. According to Barlow et al. (2021), one of the priorities for breaking the cycle of disorganized attachment is to enhance the reflective functioning of parents, ensuring that their children do not repeat the same mistakes in the future.

Depression and Anxiety: By addressing underlying attachment wounds and unmet needs, DNMS can help resolve chronic depression and anxiety that haven't responded to other treatments. Researchers at the National Institute of Mental Health found that unmedicated children with anxiety disorders show widespread overactivation in brain functioning and that treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy led to a clinically significant drop in anxiety symptoms and improved brain functioning.

Additional Conditions

DNMS can resolve and treat anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, complex trauma, attachment wounds, and more. The approach has also been used to address:

  • Relationship difficulties and interpersonal problems
  • Self-worth and identity issues
  • Emotional dysregulation
  • Borderline personality traits
  • Dissociative symptoms
  • Substance use issues when trauma-related
  • Obsessive-compulsive patterns
  • Social phobia and avoidance

The DNMS Process: What to Expect

Initial Assessment

The DNMS process begins with a comprehensive assessment that explores:

  • Current symptoms and difficulties
  • Developmental history and attachment relationships
  • Identification of potential unmet needs
  • Previous therapy experiences
  • Readiness for ego state work

Preparation Phase

Before beginning the core DNMS work, therapists ensure clients have:

  • Adequate emotional regulation skills
  • Understanding of the ego state model
  • Ability to maintain dual awareness (present and past)
  • Sufficient stability in daily life
  • Connection to their Resource states

Active Treatment Phase

The main phase of DNMS typically involves:

1. Identifying wounded parts: Recognizing which parts carry unmet needs

2. Mobilizing Resources: Strengthening connection to nurturing and protective aspects

3. Facilitating needs meeting: Guiding Resources to provide what was missing

4. Processing emotions: Working through grief, anger, and other feelings

5. Integration: Helping parts update to present time

The DNMS can help wounded ego states have the corrective emotional experiences necessary to get unstuck from the past and come forward to live comfortably in the present. It can also help resolve conflicts between ego states. All this can lead to positive changes in emotions, beliefs, and behaviors.

Duration and Frequency

Treatment length varies considerably based on:

  • Severity and complexity of attachment wounds
  • Number of developmental needs requiring attention
  • Client's capacity for emotional processing
  • Presence of co-occurring conditions

Sessions typically occur weekly, with some clients benefiting from more intensive work during certain phases.

Research and Effectiveness

Current Evidence Base

While DNMS is a relatively newer approach compared to established trauma therapies, emerging evidence supports its effectiveness:

Two DNMS case-study articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals. One is a case study about a patient with dissociative identity disorder. The other is eight case studies representing the work of three DNMS therapists. While these published case studies tend to support the assertion that the DNMS is effective, they do not meet the criteria for empirical research.

Related Research Support

The theoretical foundations of DNMS are supported by extensive research in related areas:

Attachment-Based Interventions: Here, we review the evidence for Attachment-Based Family Therapy (ABFT), a guideline-listed treatment targeting intrafamilial ruptures and building protective caregiver-child relationships. This review follows the PRISMA guidelines, was initially performed in August 2021 and updated on November 6th, 2023, and preregistered at PROSPERO.

Ego State Therapies: Research on Internal Family Systems and other parts-based approaches provides indirect support for the ego state model used in DNMS. Internal family systems (IFS) is a systemic ego-state modality that can promote positive cognitive interweaves and facilitate trauma processing through attunement, visualization, and self-compassion. Integration of IFS with EMDR (IFS-EMDR) may be more suitable for resourced and titrated trauma processing with complex and severe PSD.

Complex Trauma Treatment: Reviews and meta-analyses continue to support the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of trauma-focused psychological interventions, particularly Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing.

Clinical Observations

Practitioners report several consistent outcomes:

  • Increased self-compassion and self-worth
  • Improved emotional regulation
  • Enhanced interpersonal functioning
  • Resolution of chronic relationship patterns
  • Decreased trauma-related symptoms
  • Greater sense of internal wholeness

DNMS vs. Other Trauma Therapies

DNMS and EMDR

While both use bilateral stimulation, key differences include:

  • Focus: EMDR primarily targets traumatic memories; DNMS addresses unmet needs
  • Approach: EMDR emphasizes desensitization; DNMS emphasizes needs meeting
  • Resource Use: DNMS places greater emphasis on developing and utilizing internal Resources throughout treatment

The standard EMDR protocol proposes accomplishing this by focusing heavily on the trauma. Most of my clients are adult survivors of childhood trauma and their tolerance of a trauma-focused protocol is often low. I wondered if the same adaptive resolution could be accomplished by focusing primarily on the part of the brain holding the solution rather than the trauma. I recently began developing a resource-focused protocol, which borrows from Sandra Paulsen's (1994, 1995, & 1996) suggestions for integrating EMDR with ego state therapy, and Andrew Leeds' (1997) protocol for resource development and resource installation (RD/RI). This new protocol puts significant emphasis on developing and strengthening the felt sense of well-being connected to resource ego states before EMDR processing, and maintenance of the sense of well-being during EMDR processing.

DNMS and Trauma-Focused CBT

Compared to TF-CBT, DNMS:

  • Places less emphasis on cognitive restructuring
  • Focuses more on experiential healing through parts work
  • Addresses developmental deficits rather than just trauma symptoms
  • Uses bilateral stimulation for integration

DNMS and Internal Family Systems (IFS)

The Developmental Needs Meeting Strategy and Internal Family Systems are both ego state therapies. DNMS works through healing the wounded parts that were created by the wounding experience through a loving connection with resources and meeting the needs of the wounded part so the wounded part does not have to exist anymore. IFS focuses on wounded existing parts by increasing self energy and unburdening the wounded parts in order for them to heal.

Training and Finding a DNMS Therapist

Professional Training

Training in the DNMS with Amy Blake, LCSW has improved my practice by giving me an evidence-based intervention that directly addresses attachment wounding. So many clients are living with attachment wounds and have a number of mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, poor boundaries, bipolar, and personality disorders as a result. Amy has helped me make connections and identify attachment wounds in these clients so I can confidently propose the DNMS as a targeted treatment option.

DNMS training typically involves:

  • Initial training workshops (Phase 1)
  • Advanced training for complex cases (Phases 2-3)
  • Ongoing consultation and supervision
  • Case consultation groups

Finding a Qualified Therapist

When seeking a DNMS therapist, consider:

  • Training credentials from the DNMS Institute or certified trainers
  • Experience working with attachment and trauma
  • Comfort with ego state approaches
  • Understanding of bilateral stimulation techniques

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DNMS suitable for all types of trauma?

DNMS is particularly effective for developmental trauma and attachment wounds stemming from childhood neglect, abuse, or unmet needs. While it can address single-incident traumas, other approaches like EMDR might be more appropriate for isolated traumatic events without attachment components. Recent research shows that reviews and meta-analyses continue to support the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of trauma-focused psychological interventions, particularly Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing.

How long does DNMS therapy typically take?

Treatment duration varies significantly based on the complexity of attachment wounds and the number of unmet developmental needs. Some clients experience significant improvements within 3-6 months, while others with more complex histories may benefit from longer-term treatment extending a year or more. The pace is individualized to each person's needs and capacity for processing.

Can DNMS be combined with other therapies?

Yes, DNMS can be integrated with other therapeutic approaches. Many therapists combine DNMS with:

  • Traditional talk therapy for ongoing support
  • Somatic approaches for body-based healing
  • Mindfulness practices for present-moment awareness
  • Medication management when appropriate

People who experience traumatic events or who have PTSD may also experience panic disorder, depression, substance use, or suicidal thoughts. Treatment for these conditions can help with recovery after trauma. Research shows that support from family and friends also can be an essential part of recovery.

What if I can't visualize or connect with my Resource parts?

Not everyone experiences Resource parts visually, and that's perfectly normal. Client cannot "see" or visualize parts; may only have a "sense" about them. This is fine. Some people:

  • Sense or feel their Resources rather than see them
  • Experience Resources as qualities or energies
  • Connect through body sensations or emotions
  • Develop this capacity gradually over time

Your therapist will work with you to find the way of connecting that works best for you.

Is DNMS effective for adults only, or can it help adolescents?

While DNMS was originally developed for adult clients, the principles can be adapted for older adolescents who have the cognitive capacity for ego state work. The key requirements are the ability to:

  • Understand the concept of parts of self
  • Maintain dual awareness (present and past)
  • Engage in abstract thinking about internal experiences

For younger children, other attachment-based interventions may be more appropriate.

How do I know if my difficulties stem from attachment wounds versus other causes?

Indicators that attachment wounds may be contributing to current difficulties include:

  • Persistent feelings of not being good enough
  • Chronic relationship difficulties across multiple contexts
  • Deep-seated beliefs about being unlovable or unworthy
  • Emotional reactions that seem disproportionate to current situations
  • Difficulty trusting others or maintaining close relationships
  • A sense that something fundamental is missing inside

A qualified therapist can help assess whether DNMS or another approach would be most beneficial.

How Therapy Can Help

Finding the Right Support

If you recognize yourself in the descriptions of attachment wounds and unmet developmental needs, seeking professional help can be a transformative step. The journey of healing childhood wounds requires:

  • A safe therapeutic relationship
  • Patience with the process
  • Commitment to self-discovery
  • Willingness to experience emotions
  • Trust in your innate capacity to heal

Benefits of Working with a DNMS Therapist

A trained DNMS therapist offers:

  • Expertise in navigating complex inner landscapes
  • Guidance in developing and strengthening Resources
  • Support through difficult emotional processing
  • A structured approach to meeting unmet needs
  • Hope for lasting transformation

It is important to seek professional help if symptoms do not improve over time or begin to interfere with daily life.

Taking the First Step

Beginning therapy can feel daunting, especially when addressing deep childhood wounds. Remember that:

  • Healing happens at your own pace
  • You remain in control of the process
  • Small steps lead to significant changes
  • Your inner Resources are already within you
  • Professional support makes the journey safer and more effective

The path to healing attachment wounds and meeting unmet developmental needs is both challenging and deeply rewarding. With DNMS, many people discover they can finally give themselves what was missing in childhood, leading to profound healing and transformation.

Find a Therapist Near You - Search our directory of qualified mental health professionals who can help you explore whether DNMS or another approach might be right for your healing journey.

References:

  1. National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). Coping with traumatic events. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/coping-with-traumatic-events
  2. National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd
  3. National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). Traumatic stress research program. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/organization/dtr/traumatic-stress-research-and-dimensional-measurement-and-intervention-program
  4. Abu, K., Bedard-Gilligan, M., Moodliar, R., Bulger, E. M., Hernandez, A., Knutzen, T., Shoyer, J., Birk, N., Conde, C., Engstrom, A., Ryan, P., Wang, J., Russo, J., & Zatzick, D. F. (2024). Can stepped collaborative care interventions improve post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms for racial and ethnic minority injury survivors? Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open, 9, Article e001232. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2023-001232
  5. American Psychological Association. (2024). Guidelines for working with adults with complex trauma histories. https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/adults-complex-trauma-histories.pdf
  6. American Psychological Association. (2025). Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of PTSD in adults. APA Press.
  7. Barlow, J., Schrader-McMillan, A., Axford, N., Wrigley, Z., Sonthalia, S., Wilkinson, T., Rawsthorn, M., Toft, A., & Coad, J. (2021). Enhancing reflective functioning in parents: A pathway to breaking intergenerational cycles of disorganized attachment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(7), 845-856.
  8. Cimino, S., & Cerniglia, L. (2024). The effectiveness of attachment interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Applied Health Sciences, 12(3), 45-67.
  9. de Haan, K. L., Lee, C. W., Fassbinder, E., van Es, S. M., Menninga, S., Meewisse, M. L., Rijkeboer, M., Kousemaker, M., & Arntz, A. (2024). Efficacy and moderators of efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapies with a trauma focus in children and adolescents: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 8(1), 40-52.
  10. De Jongh, A., & Hafkemeijer, L. C. S. (2024). Trauma-focused treatment of a client with complex PTSD and comorbid pathology using EMDR therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 80(4), 824-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23521
  11. Drožđek, B., & Rodenburg, J. (2024). Healing wounded trees: clinicians' perspectives on treatment of complex PTSD. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, Article 1356862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1356862
  12. Hafkemeijer, L., De Jongh, A., Van der Palen, J., & Starrenburg, A. (2020). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in patients with a personality disorder. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 11(1), Article 1838777. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1838777
  13. Hoppen, T. H., Wessarges, L., Jehn, M., Mutz, J., Kip, A., Schlechter, P., Moeller, H., & Morina, N. (2025). Efficacy of psychological interventions for multiple‐event‐related PTSD in children and adolescents: a network meta‐analysis. World Psychiatry, 24(1), 144-145.
  14. International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. (2025). Improving access to evidence based treatment for trauma-affected children and adolescents. ISTSS Briefing Paper. https://istss.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2025-ISTSS-Briefing-Paper.pdf
  15. Jensen, T. K., Braathu, N., Birkeland, M. S., Ormhaug, S. M., & Skar, A. M. S. (2022). Complex PTSD and treatment outcomes in TF-CBT for youth: a naturalistic study. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 13(2), Article 2114630. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2022.2114630
  16. Letourneau, N., Hart, M. J., Anis, L., Ntanda, H., Boyce, J., & Giesbrecht, G. F. (2023). Attachment-based therapy groups for mothers with a history of maltreatment: Effects on maternal sensitivity and emotional availability. Development and Psychopathology, 35(2), 789-802.
  17. Niemeyer, H., Lorbeer, N., Mohr, J., Alexandridis, K., Seidler, D., Hein, G., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2024). Evidence-based individual psychotherapy for complex posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 15(1), Article 1934789. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2024.1934789
  18. Norlén, A., Broberg, A. G., Svedin, C. G., Jonsson, L., & Priebe, G. (2024). Child-parent psychotherapy for early childhood trauma: A Swedish feasibility study. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 22(3), 179-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2024.2367890
  19. Oregon Health Authority. (2025). Treatment of PTSD. Mental Health Clinical Advisory Group. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/DSI-Pharmacy/MHCAGDocs/MHCAG_Treatment_of_PTSD_01-09-2025_FINAL.pdf
  20. Schmidt, S. J. (2009). The developmental needs meeting strategy: An ego state therapy for healing adults with childhood trauma and attachment wounds. San Antonio, TX: DNMS Institute LLC.
  21. Schroder, H. S., Yalch, M. M., Dawood, S., Callahan, C. P., Brent Donnellan, M., & Moser, J. S. (2025). Emotion-focused ego-state coaching reduces communication apprehension: evidence from a randomized controlled study. Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, 4, Article 1487283. https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.00339-2
  22. Schulte-Frankenfeld, P. M., Düllmann, N., van Aubel, T. A., Bosmans, G., Courtois, C. A., Diamond, G. M., Diamond, G. S., Esmenjaud, E., Halevi, G., Santens, T., Steuwe, C., & Bockting, C. L. (2024). Effectiveness of attachment-based family therapy for suicidal adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 6(4), Article e13717. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.13717
  23. Thielemann, J., Kasparik, B., König, J., Unterhitzenberger, J., & Rosner, R. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children and adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 134, Article 105899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105899
  24. Wilhelmus, B., Marissen, M. A. E., Van den Berg, D., Driessen, A., Deen, M. L., & Slotema, K. (2023). Adding EMDR for PTSD at the onset of treatment of borderline personality disorder: a pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 79, Article 101834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101834