Turning Toward Our Fundamental Need for Connection

Young man looks away as girls talk behind him1980s America produced more than cocaine habits and eccentric hairstyles. Major changes in how we conceptualize and treat mental health issues emerged, perhaps most noticeably with the addition of the category “mood disorders.” A lot can be learned about our current state of mental health treatment by observing the final two decades of the 20th century.

In 1980, the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) was published (it’s now in its fifth installment). With the DSM-III came the introduction of “bipolar disorder” and the replacement of its former title: manic depression. With this new “disorder” came new drugs to treat it.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the antidepressant Prozac for the American market in 1987, followed by Zoloft and Paxil in subsequent years. The early ’90s saw a host of new, atypical antipsychotic medications, including Abilify, Seroquel, Zyprexa, and Risperidal, as patents expired on drugs such as Haldol. The preferred method of pharmaceutical treatment in the ’70s and ’80s for mood disorders, such as manic depression, was lithium, so what changed?

Psychiatric and consumer preferences shifted toward antidepressant and/or antipsychotic medication to treat disorders of the mood. In the United States, there were more than 51 million prescriptions of antidepressants and antipsychotics in 1991, but by 1998 that number rose to almost 134 million. A major influence on shaping prescribing preferences was direct-to-consumer marketing that began in 1997. This allowed pharmaceutical companies to advertise the benefits of their prescription drugs by brand if they clearly noted the drug’s side effects in the ad (Martin, 2007). Lithium is a natural element and therefore not patentable, which is why there are no commercials directed at potential consumers or prescribing practitioners.

Direct-to-consumer advertising for medical interventions is foreign to even the most developed countries in the world. The response of the market for psychotropic medications in the United States has grown beyond consumer metabolism. Sales for psychotropic medications went from $2.5 billion in 1990 to $15 billion in 1999 (Martin, 2007).

The Alienation of Diagnosis

The end of the 20th century in America misled consumers and many mental health professionals to believe that issues such as depression are always the result of a “broken brain” or a serious brain “disease.” The ostensible “cure” Categorizing and stereotyping both act to alter one’s behavior and in turn, one’s relationships. Take, for example, the story of my rescue dog. The term “rescue dog” conjures up ideas about the canine’s past in a similar way that a category or stereotype might create stigma.for many of these conditions would therefore be medical interventions such as taking psychotropic medications. This paradigm of treatment defines the problem as a disease or long-term ailment with a needed cure. The problem is viewed as internal to the person (i.e., in the brain), with a stable or chronic course, and the effect being general across many areas of the individual’s life (Castillo, 1997). For some, this news may be reassuring as relief may be found via scientific knowledge and understanding (e.g., diagnosis). For others, having a “disorder” may reinforce feelings of alienation.

Having something wrong with one’s brain may suggest that he or she is “misprogrammed” and, therefore, genetically different from other human beings. For these individuals, this paradigm of treatment often promotes a sense of hopelessness and helplessness while potentially aggravating the root problems (Castillo, 1997). If the impairment is lodged in one’s brain, it may feel as if there is a loss of agency or control over circumstances.

This lack of control and trajectory of illness is no more apparent than with the concept of schizophrenia. The perceived chronicity and severity of this category is apparent to many. Studies have found that individuals who have experienced psychotic symptoms are at greater risk for suicide when their presentation is explained using medical jargon such as with the DSM (Kingdon and Turkington, 2005). Contrarily, constructing the problem within a social and environmental scaffolding preserves agency for the individual.

Pitfalls of Categories and Stereotypes

Categorizing and stereotyping both act to alter one’s behavior and in turn, one’s relationships. Take, for example, the story of my rescue dog. The term “rescue dog” conjures up ideas about the canine’s past in a similar way that a category or stereotype might create stigma. Think about the now-dispelled myth that mental health concerns cause individuals to be more violent, which is not unlike the idea that a “rescue dog” is damaged in some way.

The idea that we have self-control over what happens in life is so appealing and desirable. As the business of treating mental health grows into corporations, Emily Martin (2007) offers the mental health field a question: Can we as individuals master a sense of authority, tranquility, and sanity by managing our own internal subjectivity? Alternatively, can we move beyond self-perception and turn toward our relational fears?

I have since abandoned the 20th century framework of “mental illness” that categorizes subjective experience as disease with a stable cure by instead seeing through the lens of culture and relationships. Essentially, we all have a fundamental need for connection and a unique story or background that brought us here. This simply means my copy of the DSM-5 now acts as a prop for the other books around it. It is no longer a weight holding my clients down.

References:

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  2. Castillo, R. (1997). Culture & mental illness: A client-centered approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  3. Kingdon, D.G., & Turkington, D. (2005). Cognitive therapy of schizophrenia. New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Lowe, J. (2015). I don’t believe in God, but I believe in lithium. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/28/magazine/i-dont-believe-in-god-but-i-believe-in-lithium.html?_r=0
  5. Martin, E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

© Copyright 2015 GoodTherapy.org. All rights reserved. Permission to publish granted by Andrew Archer, LICSW, therapist in Mankato, Minnesota

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • 8 comments
  • Leave a Comment
  • Richard

    Richard

    December 9th, 2015 at 10:02 AM

    I have never bought into the fact that there is naturally something disordered about mental illness. It is an illness just like any other that would afflict someone, and one that definitely can lead to people feeling alienated and distant from others. It can be pretty sad, actually, that something that is beyond what they have any control over can rip them apart from the people who mean the most to them.

  • Lucas

    Lucas

    December 9th, 2015 at 3:19 PM

    I know that there have been times when I have purposely tried so hard to stay strong when really all I think that I needed was a shoulder to lean non but I would refuse to admit it. I guess that I had been told so many times in life that I need to trust and believe in me so in my time of need from others, when I could have used that connection with another person to draw strength from, then I would always refuse.

  • Andrew Archer, LCSW

    Andrew Archer, LCSW

    December 10th, 2015 at 9:27 AM

    Richard, the perception of being different or separate certainly pertains to lots of different types of illness. And it makes sense that a person would feel like they do not have control of a “mental illness” largely because humans actually have limited control over their minds (healthy or otherwise). I think this has to do with the impact of our social lives on our mental functioning. Mental health is actually constructed within our relationships. Like you said, Lucas, trust within our relational sphere is frequently the connection we gain our most power from.

  • kein

    kein

    December 10th, 2015 at 10:08 AM

    We are all looking for that diagnosis, but then again I don’t want to be defined by a label.

  • Andrew Archer, LCSW

    Andrew Archer, LCSW

    December 10th, 2015 at 12:57 PM

    You are right kein. The paradox of consumer medicine is the idea of needing to know precisely and with certainty, but not necessarily wanting to be associated with it in such a reductionistic manner.

  • Sharon

    Sharon

    December 12th, 2015 at 5:21 PM

    I have had mental health problems since the age of 13 it took many years to get a name for it what a realife that I finally had a name and was told for many years not by very nice people that I was off my head now I know have a name for it I can manage it this has helped me move forward and lead a for filling life thanks to those who helped but it did take 13 years to get answers this should never happen giving mental health a lable helps you understand more on your condition and how to use self help

  • Jake

    Jake

    December 13th, 2015 at 7:31 AM

    What a great viewpoint! Thanks for sharing that!

  • Andrew Archer, LCSW

    Andrew Archer, LCSW

    December 13th, 2015 at 9:21 AM

    Sharon, I appreciate you sharing this personal experience. It can be a grueling process trying to figure out a diagnosis. What I was attempting to write about in this article was how some individuals benefit and others feel alienated from this diagnostic approach. More importantly, the medicalization of mental health seems to be causing–on a global scale–more isolation through individualized approaches rather than focusing on relationship as well as community building. The latter are the fundamentals of mental health while interventions treat acute phenomenon.

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.

* Indicates required field.

GoodTherapy uses cookies to personalize content and ads to provide better services for our users and to analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this site you consent to our cookies.