Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a form of treatment for depression that is administered over a period of days and weeks. Individuals with chronic and severe depression, and those who do not respond well to medication or traditional treatments, may benefit from this type of approach. However, the more exposure a client has to ECT, the higher the risk of cognitive impairment. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is another type of treatment that involves stimulating certain regions of the brain to improve synapsis plasticity. This technique is also administered over days and weeks and has been shown to be effective at reducing the symptoms and severity of depression. Unlike ECT, existing research has shown that this treatment does not cognitively impair clients. But there is not enough research to determine whether the frequency and duration of treatment influences overall effectiveness.

To address this void in research, Cherrie Galletly of the Adelaide Clinic at Ramsay Health Care Mental Health Services in South Australia recently conducted a study comparing daily rTMS to nondaily rTMS. Galletly enrolled 77 participants with major depression into the study, many of whom had co-occurring mental health problems such as abuse issues, posttraumatic stress, and substance misuse. The participants were placed either in the daily rTMS condition where they received treatment 5 days every week for 4 weeks or in the nondaily condition where they received only three rTMS sessions a week for 6 weeks.

Galletly chose this sampling of participants because she wanted her test subjects to mimic real-life clinical situations, in which a large number of depressed individuals also have other mental health problems. Additionally, the participants were selected only if they had been resistant to other forms of treatment, including medication. Galletly found that after 4 weeks, the group with daily treatment had better outcomes than the nondaily group. However, when Galletly examined both groups at 6 weeks, their responses were equally good. These results suggest that the overall number of rTMS sessions influences outcome rather than the duration of treatment. Galletly said that the results indicate that “the efficacy of rTMS is related to the number of treatments given and that spacing the treatments neither improves nor reduces efficacy.”

Reference:
Galletly, C., Gill, S., Clarke, P., Burton, C., Fitzgerald, P. B. (2012). A randomized trial comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation given 3 days/week and 5 days/week for the treatment of major depression: Is efficacy related to the duration of treatment or the number of treatments? Psychological Medicine, 42.5, 981-988.

© Copyright 2012 GoodTherapy.org. All rights reserved.

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • 3 comments
  • Leave a Comment
  • Dane

    Dane

    May 30th, 2012 at 12:27 PM

    Whoa is that a mouthful for a treatment name or what?
    But here is one thing that kind of bugs me- wasn’t there just an article on here a couple of weeks ago extolling how good ect can be for some patients? And now we read here that over time it can cause cognitive impairment. I just would like to know why something that potentially could be harmful is being pushed one week and then kind of pulled back on another.

  • steven

    steven

    May 31st, 2012 at 1:13 AM

    whatz surprising n a great thing is that the technik worked on those who had no help from medication.I always think alternative>>>medication n drugs

  • Christine Johnson LMFT

    Christine Johnson LMFT

    May 31st, 2012 at 6:12 AM

    Most, if not all, non-natural interventions have potential side effects which are unpleasant. We are naive to think otherwise. If benefits outweigh risks, the treatment should be considered.

    Reviewing scholarly literature can provide a more consistent view of what is beneficial and what should be avoided.

    For clients with intractible depression, the relief from ECT can be amazing. If fear of long term effects is upsetting, the client is not a good candidate. Many develop cognitive impairment for other reasons. Who are we to suggest that a life of misery is preferable to potential cognitive impairment years down the road?

    I don’t know how to address your comment about the term “transcranial magnetic stimulation.” I thought it specific, descriptive and direct.

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.

* Indicates required field.

 

Advanced Search

Search Our Blog

   
GoodTherapy.org is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, medical treatment, or therapy. Always seek the advice of your physician or qualified mental health provider with any questions you may have regarding any mental health symptom or medical condition. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on GoodTherapy.org.