Study Tests Reliability of Intimate Partner Violence Survey

The World Health Organization developed a questionnaire designed to assess domestic violence and intimate partner violence (IPV) against women. The questionnaire includes items related to exposure to and victimization from physical, psychological, and sexual IPV and is known as the Violence Against Women instrument (VAWI). This instrument has been tested with some evidence of reliability in only a few countries.

Therefore, to further test its reliability and validity at discerning between those exposed to and victims of various types of IPV, Lotta Nybergh of the Department of Public Health and Community Medicine at the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden recently led a study involving 573 Swedish women between the ages of 18 and 65.

The women reported on past and present exposure to any types of IPV, and also reported specific factors related to IPV, such as use of force, weapons, and threats related to violence. Nybergh found that the VAWI was successful at identifying women of different classifications, such as good versus poor self-rated health, those who did not or who did witness physical violence in the their childhoods, and those who were exposed t or not exposed to sexual or physical acts of violence.

The results revealed that sexual violence specifically was reported by 3% of the women and 8.1% of the participants reported being victims of physical IPV. These rates are consistent to other studies conducted in Norwegian regions, but childhood exposure or witnessing was lower in Nybergh’s study and current exposure to violence was higher.

There were some inconsistencies relating to overlapping of responses. For instance, women gave positive answers to violence even when only a threat of violence occurred. Because threats are psychological in nature, additional examination is needed to determine why this response crossed over to the physical violence category. Also, sexual IPV appeared in both sexual and physical violence categories, as many women who were victims of sexual IPV reported that it indeed was also a physically violent act.

Despite these discrepancies, this research shows the VAWI is a reliable instrument for assessing IPV. “However,” added Nybergh, “Further studies examining these and other psychometric properties need to be conducted in other countries.”

Nybergh, L., Taft, C., Krantz, G. (2013). Psychometric properties of the WHO violence against women instrument in a female population-based sample in Sweden: A cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002053. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002053

© Copyright 2013 All rights reserved.

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • Leave a Comment
  • Frankie

    June 21st, 2013 at 12:29 PM

    How could the results be valid when you have to know that there aren’t that many men who will admit to being violent with their partners? The women might stand a greater chance of meeting that validity because I do think that most women are going to be inclined to be honest about this if it is happening to them. But on the other hand I don’t think that there are going to be that many who would admit to hitting or being abusive toward their partner and I sure don’t think that there are going to be very many men who will admit to being the one hwo is getting abused. Somehow it’s like that would strip them of their masculinity or something.

  • ashley

    June 22nd, 2013 at 12:26 AM

    why is it wrong to classify a threat as abuse?its not just about the act happening. it is also the fear in the victim’s could differ from person to person but is valid nevertheless. to say it is not aggression because the ac did not happen would just be wrong.

  • Jenna

    June 22nd, 2013 at 4:45 AM

    And why would you do this in other countries?
    If this is a place that is very masculine cenetered and focused, then noone is going to tell the truth about what really happens behind closed doors.

  • Stuart

    June 24th, 2013 at 7:13 AM

    Typical. Another study that insinuates that violence in relationships is a male phenomenon. Poor science and feminist bias. Violence exists in same sex relationships too. As a therapist I have frequently worked with lesbian couples and gay couples with violence issues. Female violence towards men is undereported and clearly not “sexy” to research

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of's Terms and Conditions of Use.

* Indicates required field.

GoodTherapy uses cookies to personalize content and ads to provide better services for our users and to analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this site you consent to our cookies.