Personalized Care Has Similar Outcome as Standard Care for Depression

A common approach in the treatment of depression is that of collaborative care (CC), which integrates primary care doctors, mental health professionals, and depression care managers to ensure that all physical, pharmacological, emotional, and social needs of a client are being addressed. The depression care manager (DCM) acts as a liaison between the client and professionals to provide guidance, assistance, and monitoring of treatment. Although this approach has been shown to be a highly effective one, the outcomes among minority individuals and African-Americans in particular, leave much to be desired. The social and financial barriers that are present for many African-Americans are difficult to overcome, even with the help of a DCM. Therefore, Lisa A. Cooper of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Maryland wanted to see if a tailored CC approach, designed specifically to meet the unique needs of African-Americans, would result in better depression and treatment outcomes.

In a recent study, Cooper followed 132 African-American participants with depression and 27 primary care doctors through treatment and beyond. She assessed them at baseline and then every six months for a year and half. She evaluated their levels of depression, treatment adherence, cognitive functioning, use of mental health services, and the clients’ ratings of care. Half of the participants were assigned to standard CC while the other half were provided with a DCM and assigned to the tailored CC which addressed specific concerns relative to African-American clients, including communication with doctors, negative views toward medication, and financial and insurance barriers.

Cooper found that overall both groups of participants had similar outcomes at 12 and 18 months, with all of the participants having similar levels of symptom reductions. But the participants in the standard CC had higher levels of treatment adherence, while those in the tailored CC group had higher levels of satisfaction, motivation, and higher DCM ratings. In particular, the tailored CC participants were more likely to rate their DCMs as helpful and reported higher levels of education, knowledge, and mental health counseling than the standard CC participants. Even though the DCMs were not licensed psychologists, they were able to provide much needed psychological support and guidance to the participants, especially those who would not normally go to a therapist. In sum, Cooper believes that standard CC may lead to better treatment adherence, but tailored CC leads to higher DCM ratings, which could improve treatment adherence in the long run. “However, our results do not justify advocating strongly for one approach over the other since there were minimal differences in clinical improvement between the two groups,” said Cooper.

Cooper, Lisa A., et al. Comparative effectiveness of standard versus patient-centered collaborative care interventions for depression among African Americans in primary care settings: The BRIDGE Study. Health Services Research 48.1 (2013): 150-74. Print.

© Copyright 2013 All rights reserved.

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • Leave a Comment
  • Simon


    March 8th, 2013 at 3:53 AM

    It makes so much SENSE to have all of these providers involved, but my real worry with this, and it’s bad that it always has to boil down to this, but. . . how is someone with limited resources or even no health insurance supposed to be able to afford receiving integrated care from all of these different avenues? I mean, it would be great if this did not even have to come into play, but the reality of life today is that this has to play a huge factor for many people. Lots of people won’t even seek help from one care giver today because of the cost so I fear just how much telling them they needed to seek help from several different providers would further push them away.

  • ERIC


    March 9th, 2013 at 10:33 PM

    Surprised that the tailored method had drawbacks in a few areas compared to the regular CC it was regarding adherence, I think the reason was the clients got comfortable in the tailored method and that made the adherence hard?funny how we tend to give less importance to the things we are comfortable with.taking for granted is what I’d say has happened here.

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of's Terms and Conditions of Use.

* Indicates required field.

GoodTherapy uses cookies to personalize content and ads to provide better services for our users and to analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this site you consent to our cookies.