Narrative Hypnosis Specialist Reacts to APA Meeting

The American Psychiatric Association, or APA, recently held its annual meeting in New Orleans, perhaps an apt location for the event given the difficulties being endured by those keeping a weary eye on the massive oil spill along the Gulf Coast. The meeting itself was focused on bringing discussions, discoveries, and new ideas to professionals from around the country, and among those in attendance, a narrative hypnosis specialist based in Vermont was especially impressed by the decline of medication-related lectures, giveaways, and advertisements typically associated with the meeting.

Psychiatry and related medical fields have come under serious scrutiny in recent years as everyone from professionals to regulators to clients themselves question the prevalence of medications and seek to discover whether they may be best reserved for backup or temporary measures when therapy and other treatments prove unsuccessful. The specialist, who proposes that while medications are certainly able to help some people, they are doubtless over-prescribed and treated as band-aid measures, notes that the APA’s meeting was lacking the sponsor name-plastered pens, giant advertisements, and other pharmaceutical overtones experienced in recent years.

The specialist argues that clients are too often taught that their psychological concerns are simple matters of chemistry that should conveniently be swept clean with a drug, especially in the case of basic human functioning such as sleeping. Through the specialist’s eyes, it seemed that the APA is responding to the community’s increasing interest in meaningful, long-term, client-sustained treatments rather than immediate, if often costly, chemical cures. Though coping rather than covering up may not always be the most popular option, it’d appear that the APA has begun to heed the call of many professionals in the US and worldwide for a return to getting along without the psychiatric drug onslaught.

© Copyright 2010 by By John Smith, therapist in Bellingham, Washington. All Rights Reserved. Permission to publish granted to

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • Leave a Comment
  • todd


    June 5th, 2010 at 5:33 AM

    it is always better to take a route that has as little pharmaceuticals as possible.its not only because of the chemical and biological effect that too much of pharmaceuticals may have but also about the prevention of possible intervention in the development that large pharmaceutical corporations may have!

  • Rene


    June 5th, 2010 at 7:08 AM

    I actually work in the emdical field and it has always distressed me that so much business is done with the promises of freebies and giveaways. I know that I too have benefitted from these gifts but it has made me over the past few years question what patients have had to sacrifice as a result.

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of's Terms and Conditions of Use.

* Indicates required field.

GoodTherapy uses cookies to personalize content and ads to provide better services for our users and to analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this site you consent to our cookies.