Are College Admissions Tests Biased?

asian-student-taking-testStandardized testing is a huge industry, with dozens of test preparation companies offering tutoring, group classes, and hundreds of books designed to help students perform well on the SAT, ACT, and high school graduation exams. High school students have labored under testing pressure for as long as there have been high schools, but there is mounting evidence that standardized admissions tests may not be the best measures of a student’s intelligence or potential college success.

In 2012, the College Board changed testing standards for the SAT by requiring that students attach a photo to their tests. The decision was met with outrage from organizations advocating for fair testing, and has renewed concerns about the validity of college admissions tests.

Test Scores and Class

There is a direct correlation between socioeconomic status and standardized test scores. Students whose parents have higher incomes tend to have higher test scores, while students from low-income families tend to underperform. Given that low-income families have fewer resources and may not be able to afford tutoring or test-preparation classes, this is unsurprising. Because standardized tests tend to be treated as representations of a student’s innate ability, however, low-income students are at a marked disadvantage, and their test scores may convey little about their intelligence.

Stereotype Threat

Stereotypes about minority groups are common, but exposure to these stereotypes can be extremely harmful, even limiting academic achievement. Several studies have demonstrated that when a person is exposed to stereotypes about his or her group, he or she is more likely to conform to those stereotypes and underperform. For example, a female high school student who is reminded that girls score lower than boys on math tests is more likely to do poorly on a math test.

Because stereotypes are so prevalent, minority groups don’t need to be reminded of them. A simple reminder of their membership in a minority group is enough to activate stereotype threat. Almost all standardized tests ask students about their sex and ethnicity, which may activate stereotype threat and explain, in part, the underperformance of minority groups. The SAT’s new requirement that students submit a photo has raised concerns that a student’s ethnicity and sex will become even more salient, further undermining the performance of minorities.

Cultural Biases

Although standardized tests are supposed to test basic skills all students learn in school, they can end up inadvertently putting some at a disadvantage. For example, a word problem about a cruise to Alaska might seem innocuous. But to a child who has never been on a cruise or who does not know what a cruise is, the wording can be confusing, making it challenging to answer a problem the test-taker might otherwise easily answer.

Occasionally, overt bias makes its way into a test. In a 2007 New York state high school graduation test, students read a 1922 passage outlining efforts to “teach the native races.” One question about the passage asked, “What are two ways the British improved the lives of Africans?” For racial minorities, these sorts of questions can be extremely hurtful, offensive, and off-putting, undermining their ability to perform well on tests.

Other Approaches

Colleges are increasingly recognizing that standardized tests aren’t the only way to measure intelligence and potential. About 800 schools—many of them high-ranking universities—are willing to admit students without SAT or ACT scores, choosing to focus on grades, recommendations, essays, and life experience instead.

References:

  1. Gorlick, A. (2009, February 24). Stanford News. Stereotype Threat Harms Female, Minority Performance. Retrieved from http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/february25/stereotype-threat-harms-latent-ability-022509.html
  2. Jaschik, S. (2010, June 21). New evidence of racial bias on SAT. Inside HigherEd. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/06/21/sat
  3. Strauss, V. (2012, November 28). Colleges that don’t require SAT or ACT: New survey. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2012/11/28/colleges-that-dont-require-sat-or-act-new-survey/
  4. The ACT: Biased, inaccurate, coachable, and misused. (2008, December 16).Education.com. Retrieved from http://www.education.com/reference/article/Ref_ACT_Biased/
  5. Rammohan, Y. T. (2007, May 9). Advocates say standardized tests often flunk cultural bias scrutiny. Medill Reports Chicago. Retrieved from http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=35935

© Copyright 2013 GoodTherapy.org. All rights reserved.

The preceding article was solely written by the author named above. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

  • 2 comments
  • Leave a Comment
  • marco

    marco

    July 6th, 2013 at 4:42 AM

    I can’t say that I have ever experienced bias in the classroom or with testing
    and I ain’t some run of the mill Caucasian kid
    i guess it happens somewhere else
    or maybe it’s just an excuse that has been cooked up by those who feel oppressed
    looking for a reason why success often feels so elusive

  • Keeleigh

    Keeleigh

    July 8th, 2013 at 4:32 AM

    Can you please tell me how the way a sentence is worded can be so bad? If someone is smart then they are going to know the answer no matter how a question is written.

Leave a Comment

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.

* Indicates required field.

GoodTherapy uses cookies to personalize content and ads to provide better services for our users and to analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this site you consent to our cookies.