Patterns of Attachment in Adults
December 3rd, 2009
By Arthur Becker-Weidman, Ph.D., Attachment Topic Expert Contributor
Click here to contact Arthur and/or see his GoodTherapy.org Profile
In a previous article I described what attachment is and how it develops. The attachment system is a proximity seeking system that evolved to ensure the survival of the human infant. It operates like your home heating and cooling system. If everything is fine (safe) you don’t see the system operating. When things get out of bounds, the heating or cooling system starts to operate. When a person feels some threat, the attachment system becomes activated and attachment behaviors are evoked. Attachment behaviors are proximity seeking behaviors that draw the person closer to a preferred caregiver. The proximity creates or renews or recreates a secure base; a sense of safety, security, and comfort from which the person, once settled, can begin exploring the world.
I then described patterns of attachment in children. These patterns develop in response to the sort of caring that the child experiences. In adults the patterns are: Secure, Preoccupied, Dismissing, and Disorganized. These are categories that have been refined and identified by extensive empirical research across cultures. There is a large body of research supporting these categorizations. In the research literature there are several subtypes within each category and two other categories that we won’t be concerned with in this article (Earned Secure and Cannot Classify).
The Adult Attachment Interview is the primary method for assessing an adult’s state of mind with respect to attachment. There is extensive literature regarding this semi-structured interview’s reliability and validity. It is a very useful tool for the assessment of adults and is a powerful tool for clinical use. In the Adult Attachment Interview the person’s narrative is evaluated along two primary dimensions. The first dimension is coherence.
Coherence refers to answers that:
• provide a clear and convincing description;
• are truthful, succinct, and complete;
• are presented in a clear and orderly manner.
The second dimension is the ability to reflect on the motives of others.
In evaluating the adult’s narrative we look at four dimensions.
1. Quality. To be truthful and to have evidence for what is said.
2. Quantity. To be succinct and complete. Make your contribution as informative as is required but no more so.
3. Relevance. To be relevant.
4. Manner. To be clear and orderly. Avoid obscurity of expression, ambiguity, and be brief and orderly in discourse.
SECURE
The adult with a secure pattern of attachment has the capacity to view others with few distortions. They value relationships, emotions, and attachment. When they take the Adult Attachment Interview, their narratives are coherent, collaborative, concise, and comprehensive. They value attachments, and seem objective regarding any particular event/relationship. Descriptions and evaluations of attachment-related experiences are consistent, whether experiences are favorable or unfavorable.
DISMISSING
The adult with a dismissing pattern of attachment has difficulty viewing others without distortions. As children they learned to not put too many demands on their careers in order to get their needs met. These adults are dismissing of attachment-related experiences and relationships. Their narratives tend to be very general and non-specific. They often normalize without specific examples or evidence (“excellent, very normal mother”), with generalized representations of history unsupported or actively contradicted by episodes recounted. Their narratives are much too brief, and violate the criteria of quality. Transcripts also tend to be excessively brief, violating the criteria of quantity.
PREOCCUPIED
The adult with a preoccupied pattern of attachment has difficulty viewing others without distortions. As children they learned that to get their carer’s attention and to get their needs met, they had to be very demanding. Their narratives lack coherence. These adults tend to be preoccupied with or by past attachment relationships and experiences. The speaker often appears angry, passive, or fearful. Sentences are often long, grammatically tangled, were filled with vague usages (“dadada,” “and that”), thus violating the criteria of manner and the criteria of relevance. In addition, they tend to ramble on, going off on unrelated tangents and bring in unnecessary details violating the criteria of quantity.
DISORGANIZED
The adult with a disorganized pattern of attachment has difficulty viewing others without significant distortions. As children they had parents who were frightening. Often they have experienced chronic early maltreatment within a caregiving relationship and may be described as having significant dysfunction in their capacity to form emotionally meaningful relationships and attachments. Many people with Personality Disorders, such as Borderline Personality Disorder, have a disorganized state of mind with respect to attachment. During discussions of loss or abuse, these individuals show striking lapse in the monitoring of reasoning or discourse. For example, the individual may briefly indicate a belief that a dead person is still alive in the physical sense, or that this person was killed by a childhood thought. Individual may lapse into prolonged silence or eulogistic speech. Their relationships tend to be volatile.
©Copyright 2009 by Arthur Becker-Weidman, Ph.D., therapist in Williamsville, NY. All Rights Reserved.
-
Find the Right Therapist
-
4 Comments | Click here to leave a comment.




Comments
It is best to acknowledge the attachment we have towards our loved ones and be caring towards them and live a life of happiness and mutual care.
Dear Terry,
Yes, so true. The challenge is to be able to recognize how past experiences, or trauma, may make that difficult. Recognizing patterns of attachment can help the clinician be more helpful to the client and can help partners better understand their partner.
I am a 24yr old female. I was adopted when i was 1yr old. I was very loved by my mum. after my mum died 24yrs ago I had have counelling on and off thoughout the years and i’m seeing a awesome counellor right now and she has helped me alot but i have started to have these feelings of adeep affection and attachment towards my counsellor and i was wondering if it was ok and normal to have them. my counsellor is ok with me having these feelings for her but i keep thinking that i’m not suppose to have these feelings for her cose she’s my counsellor.
Dear Kaz,
Feelings of affection and closeness toward your counselor are not unusual in therapy. This is a close personal relationship in which the client (you) experiences being understood, empathy, concern, and support. It is not unlike the parent-child relationship (in the best sense) in that regard. So long a no boundaries are crossed and you and your counselor continue to keep this aspect of your relationship in awareness and as part of the discussion you will be on the right track.
regards and thanks so much for your question.
Leave a Reply
By commenting on this blog you acknowledge acceptance of this Blog's Terms and Conditions of Use.