Power — the ability to influence events, people, and environments — is fundamental to human relationships. While power itself is neither inherently good nor bad, its misuse can cause significant harm to individuals and communities. When power is wielded unethically in therapy, workplace settings, or personal relationships, the affected parties often benefit from professional mental health support to heal and reclaim their agency.
Recent research from 2024 indicates that more than 52.2 million workers have experienced workplace bullying, with another 22.6 million witnessing it, while data shows that 14.7 cases of discrimination and harassment per 1,000 employees were reported in 2024 — the highest level in nine years. These statistics underscore the pervasive nature of power abuse and its impact on mental health.
Table of Contents
- Understanding Power and Ethics
- Types of Power Abuse
- Power Dynamics in the Therapeutic Relationship
- Therapy to Address Abuse of Power
- Recognizing and Preventing Power Abuse
- Frequently Asked Questions
- How Therapy Can Help
Understanding Power and Ethics
Possessing power differs fundamentally from exercising it. A physically strong person may have the ability to harm others but chooses restraint. Sometimes, refraining from using one type of power (such as physical coercion) can actually increase another form of power (like social respect or moral authority).
The Right Use of Power
Power dynamics, defined as the patterns of partners enacting or resisting influence, are inherent in all relationships. The ethical use of power involves preventing harm, reducing damage when it occurs, repairing relationships, and promoting well-being. Power's effects don't always align with intentions — even well-meaning actions can cause unintended harm.
According to the CDC, workplace violence encompasses acts or threats ranging from verbal abuse to physical assaults directed toward people at work, occurring in any workplace and among any type of worker, with impacts ranging from psychological issues to physical injury or death.
Power and Consent
Informed consent forms the cornerstone of ethical power use in professional relationships. The purpose of informed consent is to educate potential patients about what to expect in treatment and from the provider's office, enabling them to make an informed choice about whether to become a patient.
Patients have a fundamental right to be informed and actively involved in their health care, including the right to make decisions about their psychiatric treatment and refuse unwanted treatments, provided the refusal is a capable one — and consent must be an ongoing process.
Examples of professional power abuse include:
- Medical settings: A doctor prescribing treatment without informing patients of appropriate alternatives, including approved therapies for their condition, other forms of treatment, or supportive care with no disease-directed therapy — failing to describe the current medically recognized standard of care.
- Legal settings: A lawyer acting for clients without consulting them first, violating the principle that clients must authorize their legal representation and maintain control over major decisions.
- Workplace settings: Harassment including verbal abuse, sexual harassment, workplace bullying or intimidation tactics, or retaliation when employees report misconduct — with retaliation being the most common EEOC allegation in fiscal year 2024, appearing in 47.8% of all charges filed.
Types of Power Abuse
Workplace Power Abuse
More than double the number of health workers reported harassment at work in 2022 than in 2018, including threats, bullying, verbal abuse, or other actions from patients and coworkers that create a hostile work environment — with important implications for mental health.
Workplace bullying, comprising negative actions and often abuse of power, can lead to trauma, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and in severe cases, suicide — impacting workplace performance, negatively affecting psychological safety, and leading to high turnover and loss of productivity.
Power Imbalance in Relationships
Research shows that romantic relationships are more satisfying and fulfilling when power is balanced relatively equally between partners, yet few couples therapy models explicitly outline how to confront relational power issues.
Power imbalances in relationships can manifest through:
- Control over financial resources
- Emotional manipulation
- Social isolation
- Threats or intimidation
- Undermining autonomy
Systemic and Institutional Power Abuse
While there is substantial research on workplace violence against the health workforce, gender-based workplace violence has received less attention, despite violence being rooted in gendered socio-economic, cultural, and institutional factors — making it crucial to understand differing experiences based on gender.
Power Dynamics in the Therapeutic Relationship
The therapeutic relationship inherently involves a power differential that requires careful ethical management. The therapeutic relationship is inherently unbalanced in terms of power, with the client investing the therapist with power, which the therapist then uses to help the client empower themselves.
Sources of Therapeutic Power
Mental health professionals hold power through:
- Clinical authority: Making diagnoses and treatment recommendations
- Knowledge asymmetry: Possessing specialized training and expertise
- Emotional vulnerability: Clients share intimate details while therapists maintain professional boundaries
- Gatekeeping functions: Ability to recommend hospitalization or provide documentation for various purposes
The clinician has extensive information about the patient while the patient lacks similar data about the clinician, and the therapist is paid to see the patient, keeps medical records, and in most cases has more extensive psychological knowledge.
Ethical Management of Power
Research reveals power dynamics in therapeutic relationships, where occupational therapists hold significant power — and while therapists are diligent in establishing respectful relationships with families from diverse backgrounds, establishing respectful relationships is insufficient for genuinely sharing power, making collaborative relationship-focused practice a relevant avenue for raising awareness about power issues.
Ethical therapists maintain professional boundaries by:
- Avoiding dual relationships that could exploit vulnerability
- Maintaining transparency about treatment decisions
- Respecting client autonomy
- Addressing power dynamics directly when appropriate
- Seeking supervision when boundary issues arise
Dual Relationships and Boundaries
The primary reason dual relationships require careful ethical evaluation is the power differential built into every counseling relationship — clients frequently experience heightened trust and emotional dependency toward their counselors, sometimes projecting authority and idealized qualities onto them, making it relatively easy for role boundaries to be misused.
The APA Ethics Code makes clear that all multiple relationships need not be avoided — only those holding significant potential for exploitation or harm to the client and those likely to lead to impaired objectivity must be avoided.
Therapy to Address Abuse of Power
Therapy for power-related issues focuses on modifying how individuals understand and use power in their relationships. Taking into account the existing vulnerability and lack of power patients experience in mental healthcare and data confirming patients' need for supportive healthcare providers and trusting relationships to foster their autonomy in shared decision-making, the systematic integration of this relational aspect seems warranted to support patients' participation.
Treatment Approaches
Effective therapy for power abuse may include:
- Identifying unhealthy patterns: Recognizing unconscious misuse of power
- Re-examining beliefs: Challenging assumptions about power and control
- Developing ethical frameworks: Learning sustainable ways to assert influence
- Rebuilding relationships: Repairing damage from past power misuse
- Empowerment work: Helping victims reclaim their agency
Special Considerations for Marginalized Groups
Individuals from marginalized communities may face additional power imbalances due to systemic oppression. Therapy can provide a space to:
- Reconnect with personal power
- Process experiences of discrimination
- Develop advocacy skills
- Build resilience against systemic power abuse
- Strengthen community connections
However, this has the potential to reinforce power imbalances, particularly in situations where families hold a lower social position due to factors such as their age, ability, class, colonial history, and ethnicity — yet therapists' discourse is often silent about acknowledgment of how their social positions affect power dynamics.
Recognizing and Preventing Power Abuse
Warning Signs of Power Abuse
Common indicators include:
- Persistent feelings of fear or intimidation
- Loss of autonomy in decision-making
- Isolation from support systems
- Financial control or exploitation
- Emotional manipulation or gaslighting
- Retaliation for speaking up
Creating Safer Environments
Crisis services should be trauma-informed, provide continuity of care from onset of crisis until stability and include follow-up, and be evidence-based and responsive to diverse needs.
Organizations can prevent power abuse by:
- Establishing clear policies and procedures
- Providing anonymous reporting mechanisms
- Training staff on power dynamics and ethics
- Implementing regular supervision and oversight
- Creating cultures of transparency and accountability
Frequently Asked Questions
What constitutes abuse of power in professional settings?
Abuse of power occurs when someone in a position of authority uses their influence to harm, exploit, or control others. This includes harassment, discrimination, retaliation, boundary violations, and failure to obtain proper informed consent for procedures or treatments.
Can power imbalances in therapy ever be completely eliminated?
While the inherent power differential in therapy cannot be entirely eliminated, ethical practitioners work to minimize harmful impacts through transparency, collaboration, respecting client autonomy, and maintaining appropriate boundaries. The goal is to use therapeutic power responsibly to empower clients.
How do I know if I'm experiencing power abuse?
Signs include feeling persistently fearful, controlled, or diminished in a relationship; having your boundaries repeatedly violated; experiencing retaliation for speaking up; or feeling unable to make autonomous decisions about your life or treatment.
What should I do if my therapist crosses professional boundaries?
First, if you feel safe doing so, address your concerns directly with your therapist. Document any incidents. If the behavior continues or you don't feel comfortable addressing it directly, contact their supervisor, the licensing board, or seek consultation with another professional. You always have the right to terminate therapy and find a new provider.
How Therapy Can Help
A mental health professional can help individuals affected by power abuse in several ways:
- Processing trauma: Working through experiences of exploitation or control
- Rebuilding self-worth: Addressing damage to self-esteem and confidence
- Developing boundaries: Learning to set and maintain healthy limits
- Improving relationships: Building more balanced connections with others
- Advocacy skills: Learning to assert needs effectively and safely
If you or someone you know has experienced abuse of power, professional support is available. The GoodTherapy directory can help you find a qualified therapist who specializes in trauma, relationship issues, and empowerment work.
References:
- American Psychological Association. (2024). Informed consent guidance and templates for psychologists. APA Services. https://www.apaservices.org/practice/business/management/informed-consent
- Ayaz, B., Baumann, A. L., Dozois, G., Nelson, S., & McAuliffe, E. (2024). A gender-based review of workplace violence amongst the global health workforce—A scoping review of the literature. PLOS Global Public Health, 4(7), e0003336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003336
- Barnett, J. E., & Hynes, K. C. (2024). Boundaries and multiple relationships in psychotherapy: Recommendations for ethical practice. Society for the Advancement of Psychotherapy. https://societyforpsychotherapy.org/boundaries-and-multiple-relationships-in-psychotherapy-recommendations-for-ethical-practice/
- Boldrini, T., Ghiandoni, V., Mancinelli, E., Salcuni, S., & Solmi, M. (2023). Systematic review and meta-analysis: Psychosocial treatments for disruptive behavior symptoms and disorders in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 61(7), 892-904.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.05.002
- Bunce, A., Hashemi, L., Clark, C., Stansfeld, S., Myers, C.-A., & McManus, S. (2024). Prevalence and nature of workplace bullying and harassment and associations with mental health conditions in England: A probability sample survey. BMC Public Health, 24, 18614. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18614-3
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, December 2). Violence and Work: Overview of workplace violence and its impact. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/violence/about/index.html
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023, October 24). Health Workers Report Harassment, Symptoms of Poor Mental Health, and Difficult Working Conditions. CDC Media Relations. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2023/s1024-Health-Worker-Mental-Health.html
- Gagné-Trudel, S., et al. (2023). Exploring therapeutic relationships in pediatric occupational therapy: A meta-ethnography. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 91(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174231186078
- HR Acuity. (2024). 2023 Workplace Harassment & Misconduct Insights. https://www.hracuity.com/resources/research/workplace-harassment-and-employee-misconduct-insights/
- Jenks, A., Adams, G., Young, B., & Seedall, R. (2024). Addressing power in couples therapy: Integrating socio-emotional relationship therapy and emotionally focused therapy. Family Process, 63(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12961
- Jenks, A., Adams, G., Young, B., & Seedall, R. (2024). Power dynamics in couple relationships: A review and applications for systemic family therapists. Family Process, 63(4), 1703-1720. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13008
- McInnis, B. J., Pindus, R., Kareem, D., & Nebeker, C. (2024). Considerations for the design of informed consent in digital health research: Participant perspectives. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 19(4-5), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646241290078
- National Association of Addiction Professionals. (2024). NAADAC/NCC AP Code of Ethics. https://www.naadac.org/code-of-ethics
- National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). NIMH Addresses Critical Need for Rapid-Acting Interventions for Severe Suicide Risk. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-updates/clinical-research-and-trials
- Oueslati, R., Woudstra, A. J., Alkirawan, R., et al. (2024). Navigating power imbalances and stigma in mental healthcare: Patient-reported barriers and facilitators to participation in shared decision-making in mental health care, a qualitative meta-summary. Health Expectations, 27(2), e13965. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13965
- Resnik, D. B. (2024). Informed consent. In The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. The International Library of Bioethics, vol 111. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82757-0_5
- Rogers, L., Hughes Spence, S., Aivalli, P., De Brún, A., & McAuliffe, E. (2024). A systematic review critically appraising quantitative survey measures assessing power dynamics among multidisciplinary teams in acute care settings. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 38(1), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2168632
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2025). 2025 National Guidelines for a Behavioral Health Coordinated System. https://988crisissystemshelp.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/national-guidelines-crisis-care-pep24-01-037.pdf
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Informed Consent Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors. https://www.fda.gov/media/88915/download
- Wu, C., Wang, N., Wang, Q., et al. (2024). Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis. PLoS One, 19(1), e0295784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295784
