Client-directed outcome-informed therapy (CDOI) is a collaborative, evidence-based approach to mental health treatment that prioritizes client feedback and measurable outcomes to guide therapeutic decisions. This innovative framework empowers clients as active partners in their treatment while providing therapists with real-time data to enhance effectiveness and prevent treatment failure.

CDOI represents a significant shift from traditional therapy models by placing the client's perspective at the center of treatment planning and adjustment. Through systematic measurement and feedback, this approach has demonstrated improved outcomes across diverse populations and treatment settings, making it a valuable tool for modern mental health practice.

Table of Contents

  • What Is CDOI Therapy?
  • History and Development
  • How Does CDOI Therapy Work?
  • Core Principles of CDOI
  • The PCOMS System: Measuring Progress
  • Research and Effectiveness
  • Benefits of CDOI Therapy
  • Who Can Benefit from CDOI?
  • Training and Implementation
  • Concerns and Limitations
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • How Therapy Can Help

What Is CDOI Therapy?

Client-directed outcome-informed therapy is a feedback-informed treatment (FIT) approach that systematically collects and uses client feedback to guide therapeutic decisions. Unlike traditional therapy models that rely primarily on therapist judgment, CDOI uses standardized measurement tools to track progress and alliance quality throughout treatment.

The approach is grounded in decades of psychotherapy research showing that treatment outcomes improve when clinicians regularly monitor patient progress using standardized instruments and adjust treatment based on this feedback. CDOI specifically incorporates the Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS), which was designated as an evidence-based practice by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and has been validated through multiple randomized controlled trials.

History and Development

CDOI therapy evolved from the collaborative work of psychologists Scott Miller and Barry Duncan, who were influenced by research indicating that the therapeutic alliance and client engagement were more important predictors of treatment success than specific therapy models. Their groundbreaking approach challenged the traditional medical model of psychotherapy by positioning clients as experts in their own recovery.

The formal establishment of CDOI occurred in 2000 with the publication of "The Heroic Client," which introduced a revolutionary framework for understanding therapeutic change. The accompanying Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) has since been implemented by hundreds of organizations and mental health professionals worldwide.

Recent developments have expanded CDOI's reach and sophistication. Duncan and Reese (2024) have evolved the feedback approach toward a multicultural orientation, ensuring the framework remains responsive to diverse populations. Additionally, the latest PCOMS manual (4th edition, 2024) incorporates advances in measurement science and implementation strategies.

How Does CDOI Therapy Work?

CDOI therapy operates on a continuous feedback loop that empowers clients while providing therapists with actionable data. The process begins with establishing a strong therapeutic alliance, followed by regular measurement of treatment progress and alliance quality.

The Feedback Process

At the start of each session, clients complete the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), a brief measure assessing their overall functioning. At the session's end, they complete the Session Rating Scale (SRS), which evaluates the therapeutic relationship. These four-item scales solicit client feedback regarding factors proven to predict success regardless of treatment model or presenting problem.

Therapists review these scores with clients in real-time, using the feedback to:

  • Identify clients at risk for negative outcomes
  • Adjust treatment approaches when progress stalls
  • Strengthen the therapeutic alliance
  • Incorporate client preferences into treatment planning

Integration with Various Therapy Models

CDOI does not utilize any fixed techniques or causal theories but strives to meet client needs by drawing from any and all techniques and theoretical frameworks. This flexibility allows therapists to integrate CDOI with their preferred treatment approaches, whether cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, humanistic, or integrative.

Core Principles of CDOI

1. Client as Expert

CDOI recognizes that clients are the ultimate experts on their own experiences and what constitutes meaningful change in their lives. Their feedback drives treatment decisions rather than therapist assumptions.

2. Pluralistic Approach

The framework embraces theoretical plurality, allowing therapists to draw from multiple treatment models based on client needs and preferences. This flexibility enhances treatment matching and personalization.

3. Social Justice Orientation

NIMH is committed to supporting research that reduces disparities in mental health services and outcomes. CDOI embodies this commitment by democratizing the therapeutic relationship and ensuring all voices are heard equally.

4. Hope and Expectancy

The approach actively cultivates hope by tracking and celebrating progress, no matter how small. Regular feedback helps clients see their improvement, reinforcing positive expectations for recovery.

5. Data-Driven Decisions

Promoting data-driven approaches for improving screening and detection, as well as referral to care, CDOI uses objective measures to guide clinical decisions, reducing bias and improving outcomes.

The PCOMS System: Measuring Progress

The Partners for Change Outcome Management System forms the measurement backbone of CDOI therapy. Eight randomized clinical trials have shown PCOMS to significantly improve effectiveness in real clinical settings while substantially reducing costs related to length of treatment and provider productivity.

Outcome Rating Scale (ORS)

The ORS is a visual analog scale measuring four domains:

  • Individual: Personal well-being and symptoms
  • Interpersonal: Close relationships and social functioning
  • Social: Work, school, and broader relationships
  • Overall: General sense of well-being

Clients mark their functioning in each area on a 10-centimeter line, providing a quick snapshot of their current state. Studies using the ORS have shown significantly larger effect sizes compared to other outcome measures, though researchers note it may be more sensitive to change.

Session Rating Scale (SRS)

The SRS assesses four dimensions of the therapeutic relationship:

  • Relationship: Feeling heard, understood, and respected
  • Goals and Topics: Working on what the client wants to work on
  • Approach or Method: The therapist's approach is a good fit
  • Overall: The session was right for the client

Therapists with a strong external feedback propensity benefit most from using progress feedback, as it provides a clear and structured way to support patients who are not on track.

Clinical Support Tools

For clients identified as "not on track" (showing inadequate progress), PCOMS includes additional assessment tools and decision trees to help therapists identify barriers and adjust treatment. These clinical support tools are particularly effective for not-on-track patients, with success rate differences between 20% and 29%.

Research and Effectiveness

The evidence base for CDOI and feedback-informed treatment has grown substantially in recent years. Ten available meta-analyses report small to medium overall effect sizes, suggesting that adding feedback to a wide range of psychological and psychiatric interventions tends to enhance their effectiveness.

Key Research Findings

Overall Effectiveness: A 2018 meta-analysis found a small overall effect of feedback on outcome (Hedges' g = 0.22). While modest, this represents meaningful improvement when applied across large populations.

Reduction in Treatment Failure: An independent meta-analysis revealed that individuals using PCOMS had a 3.5 times greater chance of achieving reliable change and 50% less likelihood of deterioration.

Cost-Effectiveness: Feedback-informed treatment resulted in an 8% increase in cases with reliable symptomatic improvements, associated with a modest incremental cost of around £15.17 per patient.

Therapist Effects: Feedback-informed treatment reduced the magnitude of therapist effects at a service-wide level, enhancing the effectiveness of psychological therapy and minimizing the gap between more and less effective therapists.

Implementation Factors

Research has identified several factors that influence CDOI effectiveness:

Good integration into everyday clinical practice seems to be a crucial factor in the effectiveness of progress feedback on improving outcomes, which strongly increases with better implementation.

Studies where therapists received training in the feedback system showed larger effects in reducing deteriorated cases. Studies conducted in the US showed significantly larger effects than those in other countries.

Benefits of CDOI Therapy

For Clients

  • Empowerment: Active participation in treatment planning and evaluation
  • Transparency: Clear understanding of progress and treatment goals
  • Personalization: Treatment tailored to individual needs and preferences
  • Early Problem Detection: Issues identified before they lead to dropout
  • Enhanced Alliance: Strengthened therapeutic relationship through collaboration

For Therapists

  • Objective Feedback: Data-driven insights into client progress
  • Professional Development: Continuous improvement through outcome tracking
  • Reduced Burnout: Clear evidence of effectiveness and impact
  • Clinical Flexibility: Freedom to use preferred approaches within the framework
  • Risk Management: Early identification of clients at risk for poor outcomes

For Organizations

  • Quality Assurance: Systematic tracking of treatment effectiveness
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduced treatment duration and improved resource allocation
  • Staff Development: Data-informed supervision and training
  • Accreditation Support: Evidence of commitment to best practices
  • Outcome Accountability: Demonstrable results for stakeholders

Who Can Benefit from CDOI?

CDOI's flexibility and client-centered approach make it suitable for a wide range of populations and presenting concerns:

Individual Therapy

  • Depression and anxiety disorders
  • Trauma and stress-related conditions
  • Substance use disorders
  • Personality difficulties
  • Life transitions and adjustment issues

Couples and Family Therapy

Research has found that PCOMS clients in couples therapy reached clinically significant change nearly four times more than non-feedback couples. CDOI is effective for:

  • Relationship conflicts
  • Communication difficulties
  • Parenting challenges
  • Family system issues

Special Populations

Recent research has expanded CDOI applications to:

  • Children and adolescents
  • Older adults
  • Culturally diverse populations
  • Telehealth settings
  • Group therapy formats

Training and Implementation

Professional Training

Implementing CDOI effectively requires specialized training. Developers provide workshops throughout the United States and internationally, with trainings frequently offered at the International Center for Clinical Excellence in Chicago and through The Heart and Soul of Change Project.

Training typically covers:

  • PCOMS administration and interpretation
  • Feedback conversations with clients
  • Clinical decision-making based on data
  • Managing "not-on-track" cases
  • Integration with existing practices

Certification Process

While formal certification is not required to use CDOI, advanced training options include:

  • Basic Training: Introduction to PCOMS and feedback principles
  • Advanced Training: Specialized applications and complex cases
  • Trainer Certification: Preparing professionals to teach CDOI
  • Organizational Implementation: System-wide adoption strategies

Implementation Considerations

Recent findings suggest that implementing progress feedback in large mental health care organizations presents challenges related to clinician characteristics and lack of adequate guidance. Successful implementation requires:

  • Leadership Support: Organizational commitment to feedback-informed practice
  • Technology Infrastructure: Systems for data collection and analysis
  • Ongoing Supervision: Regular case consultation using outcome data
  • Culture Change: Shifting from expert-driven to collaborative care
  • Quality Assurance: Monitoring fidelity and addressing drift

Concerns and Limitations

While research supports CDOI's effectiveness, several limitations warrant consideration:

Measurement Concerns

Some studies found no evidence that the PCOMS feedback system improves client well-being when using measures independent of the PCOMS intervention. This raises questions about whether improvements reflect actual change or measurement artifacts.

Implementation Challenges

Research on feedback-informed group treatment found the instrument was partially feasible, more acceptable to therapists than patients, and was not effective as intended. This suggests that:

  • Group settings may require different approaches
  • Client buy-in can be variable
  • Therapist enthusiasm doesn't guarantee effectiveness

Variable Effects

Studies with extra attention to implementation strategies did not always find effects on outcomes. Factors influencing effectiveness include:

  • Therapist characteristics and attitudes
  • Client engagement with measures
  • Organizational support
  • Cultural and contextual factors

Training Requirements

Effective CDOI implementation requires substantial investment in training and ongoing support. Therapists need diverse theoretical backgrounds and comfort with collaborative approaches, which may challenge traditional training models.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is CDOI different from other therapy approaches?

CDOI is unique in its systematic use of client feedback to guide treatment decisions. Unlike approaches that follow predetermined protocols, CDOI adapts continuously based on client progress and preferences. The therapist serves as a collaborative partner rather than an expert prescribing solutions.

How long does CDOI therapy typically last?

Treatment duration in CDOI varies based on individual needs and progress. The continuous feedback system often leads to more efficient treatment, as therapists can identify what's working quickly and adjust what isn't. Research shows PCOMS can significantly reduce costs related to length of treatment.

Can CDOI be used with other therapy approaches?

Yes, CDOI is designed to integrate with any theoretical orientation or treatment model. Whether your therapist practices cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy, or other approaches, CDOI can enhance effectiveness through systematic feedback.

What if I don't like filling out forms?

The PCOMS measures are designed to be brief (less than a minute each) and user-friendly. Many clients find that tracking their progress increases motivation and helps them feel more involved in treatment. Therapists can also adapt the feedback process to match client preferences.

Is CDOI covered by insurance?

CDOI is a framework that enhances existing therapy rather than a separate treatment requiring different billing codes. Most insurance plans that cover psychotherapy will cover treatment incorporating CDOI principles. Check with your specific provider for coverage details.

How do I find a CDOI therapist?

Look for therapists who advertise "feedback-informed treatment," "PCOMS," or "client-directed therapy." You can also ask potential therapists if they use systematic outcome monitoring or are willing to incorporate client feedback into treatment planning.

How Therapy Can Help

Client-directed outcome-informed therapy offers a powerful framework for enhancing mental health treatment through collaboration and continuous improvement. By placing clients at the center of their care and using data to guide decisions, CDOI helps ensure that therapy remains responsive, effective, and empowering.

Whether you're struggling with specific mental health concerns or seeking personal growth, CDOI's emphasis on your voice and values can make therapy more relevant and impactful. The approach's flexibility means it can adapt to your unique needs while maintaining focus on measurable progress toward your goals.

If you're considering therapy, look for providers who value collaboration, regularly check in on your progress, and adjust their approach based on your feedback. These practices, central to CDOI, can significantly enhance your therapeutic experience and outcomes.

[Find a therapist](/find-therapist) who incorporates feedback-informed practices and begin your journey toward meaningful change. Remember, in CDOI therapy, you're not just a recipient of treatment – you're an active partner in creating the life you want to live.

References:

  1. American Psychological Association. (2023). Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and feedback: Research review and recommendations. Psychotherapy Research, 33(7), 841-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2181114
  2. Better Outcomes Now. (2024). PCOMS Evidence Based Practice. https://betteroutcomesnow.com/about-pcoms/evidence-based-practice/
  3. de Jong, K., Conijn, J. M., Gallagher, R. A., Reshetnikova, A. S., Heij, M., & Lutz, M. C. (2021). Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 85, 102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102002
  4. de Jong, K., Symmonds-Buckley, M., Delgadillo, J., & Nugter, M. A. (2024). Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 51(4), 595-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01381-3
  5. Delgadillo, J., de Jong, K., Lucock, M., Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Gilbody, S., Ali, S., Aguirre, E., Appleton, M., Nevin, J., O'Hayon, H., Patel, U., Sainty, A., Spencer, P., & McMillan, D. (2024). An examination of therapists' professional characteristics as moderators of the effect of feedback on psychological treatment outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 34(6), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2310635
  6. Delgadillo, J., McMillan, D., Gilbody, S., de Jong, K., Lucock, M., Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Aguirre, E., Ali, S., & Appleton, M. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of feedback-informed psychological treatment: Evidence from the IAPT-FIT trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 142, 103873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.103873
  7. Drisko, J. W. (2025). Routine Outcome Monitoring With Feedback. Families in Society, 106(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894251345187
  8. Duncan, B., & Reese, R. (2024). The evolution of feedback: Toward a multicultural orientation. Psychotherapy, 61(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000489
  9. Duncan, B. (2024). The Partners for Change Outcome Management System manual (4th ed.). Better Outcomes Now. https://betteroutcomesnow.com/books/
  10. Goldberg, S. B., Babins-Wagner, R., Rousmaniere, T., Berzins, S., Hoyt, W. T., Whipple, J. L., Miller, S. D., & Wampold, B. E. (2024). Creating a climate for therapist improvement: A case study of an agency focused on outcomes and deliberate practice. Psychotherapy, 61(2), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000508
  11. Greenspace Health. (2026). Outcome Rating Scale | ORS. https://greenspacehealth.com/en-us/outcome-rating-scale-ors/
  12. International Center for Clinical Excellence. (2024). Training and Certification in Feedback-Informed Treatment. https://www.icce.com/training
  13. Koementas-de Vos, M. M. W., Colleye, L. C., Tiemens, B., Engelsbel, F., de Jong, K., & Nugter, M. A. (2022). The feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a feedback-informed group treatment (FIGT) tool for patients with anxiety or depressive disorders. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 25(2), 339-353. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2022.647
  14. Koementas-de Vos, M. M. W., de Jong, K., Nugter, M. A., Colleye, L. C., van Dam, A., Klungers, G. J., & Tiemens, B. (2025). Renewed Feedback-Informed Group Treatment for Patients with Anxiety and Depressive Disorders. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 52(1), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-023-01338-y
  15. National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). FY 2024 Budget - Congressional Justification. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/budget/fy-2024-budget-congressional-justification
  16. National Institute of Mental Health. (2020-2024). Goal 4: Advance Mental Health Services to Strengthen Public Health. In NIMH Strategic Plan for Research. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/strategic-planning-reports/goals/goal-4-advance-mental-health-services-to-strengthen-public-health
  17. Pejtersen, J. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., & Hansen, H. (2020). Feedback-Informed Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Partners for Change Outcome Management System. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(4), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000499
  18. Reese, R. J., Duncan, B. L., & Clements-Hickman, A. (2024). Do practice-generated data improve psychotherapy effectiveness (Routine outcome monitoring)? In F. Leong, J. Callahan, J. Zimmerman, M. Constantino, & C. Eubanks (Eds.), APA handbook of psychotherapy: Evidence-based practice, practice-based evidence, and contextual participant-driven practice (Vol. 2, pp. 193-211). American Psychological Association.
  19. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2024). Evidence-Based Practices Resource Center. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.samhsa.gov/libraries/evidence-based-practices-resource-center
  20. van Sonsbeek, M. A., Hutschemaekers, G. J. M., Janssen, R. T., Tiemens, B. G., & Nugter, M. A. (2023). Implementation of feedback-informed treatment in large mental health care organizations presents challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 50(5), 768-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-023-01294-7