A GoodTherapy.org News Update
Whether they saw the machine for themselves or only heard about it through professional gossip or industry papers, many mental health care providers came into some sort of contact with “Eliza,” a robot created in the 1960’s that posed as a viable psychotherapist. The robot made use of the Rogerian method, accepting data typed-in by the patient and returning it after a bit of processing as a set of provocative questions. It might have been interesting, or simply funny, to some professionals, while to others it may have seemed an irreverent oversimplification of the science of psychology and modern therapy practices.
Those who weren’t avid Eliza fans might cringe at the idea of Eliza 2.0, but not to worry. The re-vamped model has been produced by a team at the New York City College of Technology, of the City University of New York, not for its potential to replace a trained human therapist, but as a piece of entertainment incorporating current trends in technology. Adventuresome reporter Steve Kolowich of the Chronicle of Higher Education took a seat with Eliza to discover whether the machine was good for an insight — or just good for a laugh. Excerpted from his transcript of the conversation:
“Eliza R.: What is the first thing that comes to your mind in this session?
Me: What will I learn about you?
Eliza R.: Perhaps in your fantasies we learn about each other.
Me: Excuse me?
Eliza R.: I’m not sure I understand you fully.
Me: That makes two of us.
Eliza R.: Please go on with whatever it is you are inadequately expressing.
Me: Well … I am writing an article about you, so I want to learn what you are all about.
Eliza R.: Is it because you are writing an article about me that you came to me?
Me: Yes.
Eliza R.: You seem to be quite positively positive.
Me: I suppose I do.
Eliza R.: Really, how is that possible?
Me: I cannot say. “
© Copyright 2009 by http://www.GoodTherapy.org Therapist Schaumburg Bureau - All Rights Reserved.









I have been to an actual counselor before and that real life conversation sounded a little like that too!
Just goes to show that no matter how hard we try nothing can ever replace the comfort that you can get from a real live human being.
Therpay can help so many people on hundreds of different levels and I even think that getting therapy and davice over the internet and via self help books can at times be appropriate. But I do not think that an automaton can be something to help humans grapple with their emotions. We need those who can hekp us who have feelings and experiences in all different walk of life and a robot in most cases just is not going to cut it.
We all know the Eliza concept is outdated. Let’s move on and find more beneficial treatment routes for those who need it.
I think talking to an inanimate object would make more sense!! When help is available online with so many reliable doctors and forums, why resort to a virtual therapist. It’s like getting a virtual massage! So, keep up the good work good therapy!!
I agree with Catherine. I think that actually seeing a live person helps those because they have an actual individual that can help them… I think it’s the idea of having someone right there and being able to confide in them.
Kellie has a good point…I would rather see and talk to an actual person. I think I would feel like I was getting nowhere, or begin to wonder if someone is really listening if I had to get help via the internet or an inanimate object.