The Pink Elephant of Perception

May 5th, 2011
By Blake Edwards, MSMFT, LMFT, Family Therapy Topic Expert

Click here to contact Blake and/or see his GoodTherapy.org Profile

       

When it comes to my experience, perception is always more powerful than reality. Everything that I am is influenced by that which I perceive to be true, whether it is actually true or merely imagined. As a therapist, I have a responsibility to notice and, at times, even confront perception. I would do well to proceed respectfully, empathically, and without unnecessary provocation. At times, those real or imagined perceptions that infuse every marriage and family that I sit with act as that great big pink elephant in the room—standing between spouses and parents and children—that, unacknowledged, has a way of impeding growth in relationships and, consequently, our work together.

Sigmund Freud believed that we are forcefully determined by underlying inclinations. He believed that such inclinations maintain their power by our oblivion to them. There is a force to my perception of you. As my emotions about you interact with your emotions about me, the reality of us takes on a third identity that is quite a thing to behold. And as we scan further out into the layers of human development from family to culture to society, it is as if I am not only a system of emotions and perception but that I am embedded within increasingly complex systems of emotion and perception.

Our experiences feed our perceptions and, in turn, our perceptions influence our experiencing. Along the way, we collect these bits and pieces of emotion and reaction in our own personal bag. Oh the power of this baggage! We experience others, and so much of life, through the innuendo of its interpretations.

Our mind holds a vast collection of imagery and symbolism. Most of those images and symbols lay dormant in the dark confines of Shadow, a term Carl Jung coined to appreciate that aspect of memory and personality that we disown. Often, the Shadow becomes the most dangerous place of storage, for it requires such a vigilante guarding that the task of protection becomes the threat of projection. We inflate our Shadow by repressing these experiential images and symbols, and we become defensive to the same degree. The pretentious pomp and circumstance of some colorful personality may betray the insecurities and fear of vulnerability that lie within.

We live in constant risk of projecting the threats of childhood: the way a coach cursed and slung us into the mud by the sidebar of a face mask; the way two friends mocked or betrayed, leaving us in silence and agony; the way a pastor listened with such careful eyes to our heart’s sharing with quick darting glances to the business and files of his office, uncharmed by the grace of the moment; the way the lunch lady screeched at our clumsiness with such fire and terror that our hearts pulsed with anxiety.

Certain stimuli naturally affect certain responses: the smell of appetizing food induces salivation, touching a hot frying pan causes a reflexive jerk of pain. Pavlov taught us that these natural physiological responses can be corrupted. Every time we encounter an intense situation that produces anxiety, unconscious memory bytes associated with the original stimuli (e.g. food, frying pan) surface. These are the emotionally-loaded experience-laden images and symbols that we so often project onto our world.

During critical years of attachment, we unknowingly work to consolidate our view of the world and the general predispositions of our personality. Upon individuating from our families, such experiential fragments continue to unknowingly influence our thoughts, emotions, and behavior. Could it be that the course of our existence is determined on a far broader scale than we could have imagined?

© Copyright 2011. All Rights Reserved. Permission to publish granted to GoodTherapy.org. The preceding article was solely written and edited by the author named above. The views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

Print This Post Print This Post

  • Find the Right Therapist

  • Join GoodTherapy.org - Therapist Only
   

Comments

  • Leonard May 6th, 2011 at 7:57 AM #1

    Indeed what we see and how we see are different than other people.You know two individuals might view the same exact thing differently because of what is already in their heads.It is the perception that you have spoken about.But it is not just an angle to see things but a lot depends upon the perception.It may even sometimes be a lot more important than the subject itself,triggering off a memory or thought.

Leave a Reply

By commenting you acknowledge acceptance of GoodTherapy.org's Terms and Conditions of Use.

 

*

 

* = Required fields

 
 

Search Our Blog:

Content Author Title

   

Blog Categories

 

Find the Right Therapist

Advanced Search | Browse Locations

        therapist Topic Expert  

Recent Comments

  • Diana: My feelings of failing were similar with my divorce. That was decades ago now and I’ve learned a lot since then. I think I was raised...
  • Shana: I have to agree with the bed thing to an extent. In recent years I have made sure not to be in bed and keep myself busy with something....
  • Mason Young: Why does the use of technology always have to be viewed as a problem? It is what our workd today revolves around, we all have to have...
  • Carter: Not sure that I get why diabetes and depression would cause more heightened fear than cancer or schizophrnia- diabetes and depression seem...
  • Nellie: See the pros and cons of this kind of arrangement. But mainly if I was the therapist I am not sure how safe I would feel going into...