<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT: The Decline of the On-Screen Therapist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/</link>
	<description>Exploring Healthy Psychotherapy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/#comment-33284</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/?p=3024#comment-33284</guid>
		<description>YIKES!!!!

I don&#039;t think that being a therapist is anything like being a priest and should not be.  We are simply not that smart or dedicated.  That kind of thinking is often what confuses the public and gets displayed in television and movies.  Our role diffusion comes off as flakey and weird.  Actually, much of it is.  Simply put, We just don&#039;t know what we are and if we can&#039;t control our own ethical practice boundary definitions (by being consitent in our practices and limiting our services to what we are licensed to do) the public will do it for us.   

The whole concept of helping others with emotional and mental problems has been highly diffused with an abundant amount of resources and providers. The public can get a great deal of very good help without a &quot;tour guide&quot; called a therapist.  The lack of consistency in our treatment approaches drives people to what they onsider are more reliable and often free sources of help.  The public does not want to be exposed to crazy, weird, unorthodox, or just plain hocus-pocus non-scientific &quot;care&quot;.  I know we are trying to make a buck here - but expanding our practice boundaries into odd or culturally popular areas is not the answer to our identity crisis.  that lack of identity is the opening Hollywood exploits in the media.  They, not us, are crafting our public image.  Is that what we want?  

The costs of therapy are drastically reduced from what they were a decade ago and my wife&#039;s manicurist makes more than most therapists I know. (she is from Vietnam and does not have a high school education).   It&#039;s a different world that we have let the hollywood crazed public define for us.  Its our own fault becasue we do not protest incorrect descriptions of the therapeutic process in the media and we even applaud the commercialization of it (i.e Dr. Phil).  Does anyone think that an OB/GYN or Urologist would consider hosting a TV show! Probably not.     

Providers of mental health care, once licensed by some state or provence, seem to think they can do anything they want and call it &quot;therapy&quot;.  Just look at the very big list to the right of this blog.  Interesting, the term &quot;Marital&quot; does not even appear.  How many of these techniques were on our licensing exams?  Are we truely sanctioned to do this under our licenses or are we exceeding our practice boundary, legally and ethically?  While the word &quot;Marital does not appear, &quot;Focalizing&quot; and &quot;Yoga Therapy&quot; does. 

The public is increasingly disturstful of any licensed group who make claims and market services cloaked in mythopoetic terminology, eastern/native american religious jargon, or the ever reliable &quot;touchy-feelee you are wonderful&quot; philosophy.  It looks often like what it is, a sham.  That gives the media an perfect opening to make us look like clowns ... or worse, dangerous people to stay away from!  

The images displayed in movies and television are representative of how the public views us... not so good it seems to me.  Whether we like what we see in the mirror or not- it does not make the image any less real for the average movie-goer.  Unless we change our ways we can expect this to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YIKES!!!!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that being a therapist is anything like being a priest and should not be.  We are simply not that smart or dedicated.  That kind of thinking is often what confuses the public and gets displayed in television and movies.  Our role diffusion comes off as flakey and weird.  Actually, much of it is.  Simply put, We just don&#8217;t know what we are and if we can&#8217;t control our own ethical practice boundary definitions (by being consitent in our practices and limiting our services to what we are licensed to do) the public will do it for us.   </p>
<p>The whole concept of helping others with emotional and mental problems has been highly diffused with an abundant amount of resources and providers. The public can get a great deal of very good help without a &#8220;tour guide&#8221; called a therapist.  The lack of consistency in our treatment approaches drives people to what they onsider are more reliable and often free sources of help.  The public does not want to be exposed to crazy, weird, unorthodox, or just plain hocus-pocus non-scientific &#8220;care&#8221;.  I know we are trying to make a buck here &#8211; but expanding our practice boundaries into odd or culturally popular areas is not the answer to our identity crisis.  that lack of identity is the opening Hollywood exploits in the media.  They, not us, are crafting our public image.  Is that what we want?  </p>
<p>The costs of therapy are drastically reduced from what they were a decade ago and my wife&#8217;s manicurist makes more than most therapists I know. (she is from Vietnam and does not have a high school education).   It&#8217;s a different world that we have let the hollywood crazed public define for us.  Its our own fault becasue we do not protest incorrect descriptions of the therapeutic process in the media and we even applaud the commercialization of it (i.e Dr. Phil).  Does anyone think that an OB/GYN or Urologist would consider hosting a TV show! Probably not.     </p>
<p>Providers of mental health care, once licensed by some state or provence, seem to think they can do anything they want and call it &#8220;therapy&#8221;.  Just look at the very big list to the right of this blog.  Interesting, the term &#8220;Marital&#8221; does not even appear.  How many of these techniques were on our licensing exams?  Are we truely sanctioned to do this under our licenses or are we exceeding our practice boundary, legally and ethically?  While the word &#8220;Marital does not appear, &#8220;Focalizing&#8221; and &#8220;Yoga Therapy&#8221; does. </p>
<p>The public is increasingly disturstful of any licensed group who make claims and market services cloaked in mythopoetic terminology, eastern/native american religious jargon, or the ever reliable &#8220;touchy-feelee you are wonderful&#8221; philosophy.  It looks often like what it is, a sham.  That gives the media an perfect opening to make us look like clowns &#8230; or worse, dangerous people to stay away from!  </p>
<p>The images displayed in movies and television are representative of how the public views us&#8230; not so good it seems to me.  Whether we like what we see in the mirror or not- it does not make the image any less real for the average movie-goer.  Unless we change our ways we can expect this to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/#comment-20414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/?p=3024#comment-20414</guid>
		<description>Being a therapist I believe is quite similar to being a priest. It is not easy and it can be very difficult personally but it is one of the most satisfying careers to choose. Doing it for the money may not be of much relevance in today&#039;s scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a therapist I believe is quite similar to being a priest. It is not easy and it can be very difficult personally but it is one of the most satisfying careers to choose. Doing it for the money may not be of much relevance in today&#8217;s scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/#comment-20279</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/?p=3024#comment-20279</guid>
		<description>There have been numerous times throughout my career that I too have been very disappointed with the ways in which therapists have been portrayed onscreen. Most people are wary of beginning therapy at all, and when they see these common misconceptions about therapy brought to life on both the small and the big screen that only adds to their concern about seeking professional treatment. Most good therapists are in that profession to help, not hinder anyone, and it certainly is not about the money! We do what we do because we care, and that is the bottom line that needs to be addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been numerous times throughout my career that I too have been very disappointed with the ways in which therapists have been portrayed onscreen. Most people are wary of beginning therapy at all, and when they see these common misconceptions about therapy brought to life on both the small and the big screen that only adds to their concern about seeking professional treatment. Most good therapists are in that profession to help, not hinder anyone, and it certainly is not about the money! We do what we do because we care, and that is the bottom line that needs to be addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/#comment-20275</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/?p=3024#comment-20275</guid>
		<description>I think most of my friends in med school dont want to take psychiatry as an option. This is possibly because of the prejudice that exists about stereotyping all psychiatrists as an offshoot of hannibal lester or of a different kind of madness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of my friends in med school dont want to take psychiatry as an option. This is possibly because of the prejudice that exists about stereotyping all psychiatrists as an offshoot of hannibal lester or of a different kind of madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/#comment-20259</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/?p=3024#comment-20259</guid>
		<description>Oh no! Does that mean that my Dr Phil show is over? Where ever wil I get my advice from now? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no! Does that mean that my Dr Phil show is over? Where ever wil I get my advice from now? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/decline-of-the-on-screen-therapist/#comment-20258</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/?p=3024#comment-20258</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always bothered me to see how therapists are portrayed in popular media, typically focusing on the therapist&#039;s flaws and neurosis. It only serves to give therapists a bad wrap and to discourage people who might benefit from therapy from ever making the call. Don&#039;t you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always bothered me to see how therapists are portrayed in popular media, typically focusing on the therapist&#8217;s flaws and neurosis. It only serves to give therapists a bad wrap and to discourage people who might benefit from therapy from ever making the call. Don&#8217;t you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

