By Michael Picucci, PhD, MAC, SEP, Focalizing Topic Expert Contributor
Click here to contact Michael and/or see his GoodTherapy.org Profile
In Switzerland, Carl Jung told a young American man suffering with alcoholism that as far as medicine and psychiatry were concerned, there was no hope for him. That was in 1931, and this still remains true in 2010. The single alternative left was a religious or spiritual experience — what Jung referred to as “a genuine conversion.” Jung had heard of such experiences helping alcoholics get sober, but admitted that such cases were “comparatively rare.”
In 1934, William D. Silkworth, a prominent physician specializing in alcoholism and drug addiction had a similar slant on the problem. He proclaimed that only a message of “depth and weight” could hold the interest of the addicted person. “In nearly all cases, their ideals must be grounded in a power greater than themselves, if they are to re-create their lives.” Silkworth further stated that, “Unless this person can experience an entire psychic change there is very little hope of his recovery.” Anyone presently familiar with addictions knows that it was out of these messages that the entire Twelve-Step recovery movement was born. Addressing the relief from out-of-control obsessive desires (alcohol, drugs and other addictions) and the need to create substantive lives, the Twelve Steps have helped millions of people throughout the world. It is also clear that while this movement continues its profound and rapid growth, at its core are controversy and mutations of the experience. A 1994 issue of Common Boundary magazine states, “On the eve of the 60th birthday of Alcoholics Anonymous critics are charging that the Twelve Steps are outdated and irrelevant. Others claim they’re the doorway to new forms of spirituality and social action. Read the rest of this entry