Written by Rainer Maria Kohler, JD
Growing up as a Catholic child and teenager in Germany some sixty years ago I learned about original sin. I was told that I and every other human being inherited the mark of original sin from Adam and Eve because of their disobedience to God’s command not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Actually, in German, original sin is called Erbsünde, which means “inherited sin”. (An aside: The word Erbsünde also contains the German word Erbse which means “pea”, and for many years of my childhood I visualized my original sin as a pea-sized growth on my soul.) As a child I accepted what I was told, but as a teenager I could not comprehend why God would make me inherit a sin which I had not committed. It seemed unfair: Why should I be responsible for something over which I had had no control?
In my 20s and 30s, when I got married and had children, I began to question whether my original sin is a sin and how it could be original or inherited. Over the years of trying to raise our children and living in a close relationship with my wife it dawned on me that I was engaging in the same hurtful behavior which I had observed in my parents, both as parents and as spouses, and which I had sworn I would never repeat. How could this be happening? Was this the long and large shadow of original sin?
It took me many more years and my intense immersion in the depth psychology of C. G. Jung before I began to understand that although this long shadow, which reaches down to me from my parents and from all of my ancestors, acts with the strength and mystery of magic power, it is in fact a natural and inevitable consequence of my human nature. It is impossible for us to escape, more than just a little, the powerful patterns of perception, feeling and behavior which have evolved in humans during the millennia of the evolution of homo sapiens. Although these human patterns appear to be similar to the animal instincts, they are not the same. The instincts regulate the animals completely in all of their behavior, while our human patterns of perception, feeling and behavior leave us some room, albeit small, to make choices and decisions. Even Adam and Eve already had a choice to eat or not to eat the fruit from the tree. In the context of our discussion it does not matter whether these human patterns are “inherited” genetically or through unconscious imitation or both. In either case they are transmitted so successfully and regularly that they seem to be ordained by divine decree.
The Catholic Church has it partially right, therefore, when it claims that there are inclinations and propensities in us, in each and every human being, which have been “inherited” from, or are “original to” our ancestors, all the way back to Adam and Eve who can be seen as the symbolic and original parents of homo sapiens. But why should these inclinations and propensities be sinful? Read the rest of this entry